10 Disturbing Child Experiments12. September 2013 Via 10 Disturbing Child Experiments.Share ThisTweetTeilenPlus oneTeilenEmailFrühere Beiträge Kann man mit dem Pipimann auch AA machenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXG3lsTsbQE Via Mini MacBook Air MirrorBook Is Cool And Cutehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJtgc0Mib6c Via Baby Monkey Nala Gets A Bathhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1Eh6ulmeJ0 ViaDieser Beitrag hat 808 KommentareChild experiments are disturbing in general ._.this music makes it more creepyOmg 3 is so fucked up10 sounds like bad girls club, send girls to a house to wait for conflict. smh oh T.V. now a daysNumber 2 I would do that test cause who doesn’t hate clowns.They had to do OPEN heart surgery to find out if a ******* baby is never in shock when something bad happens to them! WHO THE **** WANTS TO KNOW THAT!?That last one…For those who have taken AP Psychology half of the experiments mentioned were shown and it was crucial :'”(I don’t know whether your profile picture contradicts your comment, or emphasizes it.Some of this is stupid bullshit. The visual cliff is a safe freaking test. Its an ILLUSION. Its a table with a glass top so they can see the floor and it looks like a cliff but it ISNT. Good effing greif!The last one… would anyone ever to such a thing to my baby – I’d burn down the f*cking hospital! :Ohow the fuck do you manage to burn the penis off during a circumcision? were they using a freakin blowtorch or something?this is all Bull Shit#10 is basically a tested reality of “lord of the flies”oh wow… number three…its disgusting what science without morality will do…wow seriuslyLETS ALL MAKE CREEPY PASTAS OUT OF THESE! Anyone? No one? I…. Im sick….Why would any body let their child go through with this? Utter madnessThe little Albert one is basically child abuse!There is a film called the Wave. Does this have anything to do with number 9 on this list?This list doesnt have the one where scientists wanted to learn if humans have a “default” language. Using orphanage infants caregivers were told to not talk to the babies, not play with them or interact in any way except to satisfy their basic survival needs (feeding, changing, cleaning). The lack of social interaction depressed the babies so much that they started dieing for no reason one by one.A lot of these have been exaggerated and the context ignored. In particular the visual cliff experiment was done to see if babies could understand and interpret emotional expressions from a very young age. If a mother gives a distressed look the baby would not cross over vice a versa if it was an approving look. Evidence for emotions being wired into the brainCan’t know what not to do if no one has done what you shouldn’t do. You don’t know if those red berries are safe to eat until someone tries them, and someone eventually will if no one has already done so.Just think like this, if these messed up fucks hadn’t done this horrible stuff to the children nack then which I’m willing to murder over the shit that happened then the more fucked up scientists of today would have done now.If that even makes sense…Once you are born into this world, you can easily be subjective into almost any belief; some of those tests proves it. Thank god for the opportunity to find the truth.I feel something cold spread in my heart. I just hope it won’t get numb. Or I will ended like these scientists.Horrible, just absolutely horribleso i guess all the screaming and crying without the anesthetic was because they enjoyed being cut open. I wonder what people had for brains back thenthe first is is so unhuman!! babies can feel painoh fuck those doctorsThis is horrible especially number 1How were people even doctors back then, being so stupid? Can you imagine all the pain they must have caused people!this is just horrible, those poor childrenI don’t think that number seven is really that disturbing or cruel.This is nothing compared to what the Nazi “doctors” did in their experiments. Not saying all this isn’t bad, but….you know.Sleep is so overratedNumber 8 was sad :c poor babyHorrible!Number 2 was hilarious! I can just imagine all those little rascals ganging up on the clown!Number 3 sounds horrible…. fuck those bitch motherfuckers they deserve that.#1 is so mean, rude.Of course they feel pain! THERE BLOODY HUMANS FOR GOD SAKEoh god the last one……Why? not just why as in how can people be so cruel but what’s the point ? I mean what’s the goal ?fuckkkk!!! 1:35 jumpscare!What’s wrong with 5?poor David Reimer. His story creeps me out the most.Oh my…4 little words: first do no harm.In the wise words of assassins creed 4 To suffer without dying.This is twisted ._.What’s wrong with the person who thought of these experiments“MK-Ultra”.I think that the sex change was worst than most of the others.I need to stop watching these creepy top 10’s before I go to sleep…How can you loan babies ?Just proves how fucked up humanity really is.Nothing about Josef Mengele’s experiments?how fucking ignorant do you have to be to think that babies can’t feel pain in the same way adults can how hOWwow wtf poor babiesi wonder what happened to all those kids.Poor kids ;~;A few of these aren’t disturbing(Like number 7 and number 5) You guys went soft on this one. Plus, there are way more disturbing ones out there.Messed. Up.clowns r creepy so i dont blame the children for wanting to insult it loli dont know but i dont want to watch this…Sickthey were all terrible, but the last one really messed me up.Noooo no no oh that just sucked whatever happiness i had out of my heartalbert was the worst omg albert 🙁What about the Sandy hook experiment where they test out on how bullet proof children are? Funny as hell!!!Unit 731 in japan, dulce base new mexico… make this look like a cakewalk. Disecting babies alive mutilation etcjesus fucking hell this is fuckign creepy who would make such a goddamn video!?this is terrible…The 7th you don’t freaking say.Joseph Mengeles experiments on twins or ashkanazi jews doing experiments on Sephardic jew babies?The visual cliff is not disturbing haha, it’s an experiment on the age at which depth perception develops in infants and it’s completely ethical.WTFI am going to go lay on the floor and cry now..Number two’s a damn lie. It wasn’t a real freaking clown that the adults were shown assaulting, nor that the children beat up by imitation. For god’s sake, it was one of those “clown bop bags”, an inflatable dummy shaped like a large bowling pin with painted on features that resembled a clown. It was called the “Bobo DOLL Experiment” for REASON.i hate that peopleThe Third Wave wasn’t questionable, the whole point of that social experiment was to demonstrate to students that fascism is very dangerous, since it appeals to normal people.Regarding extremist ideologies like ‘something that could never happen again’ is dangerously naive, and the Third Wave aimed to demonstrate that.I feel like throwing up.HOW COULD THEY! NUMBER 10 D’:The cruelty of man knows no limits it seems. (man as in our species not gender I am not some man hating feminist now)Yep. My childhood is ruined. WTF……………….Forget weather the babies go into shock or not as justification to not administer anesthetic. How about their admitted AGONY? WTF….WTF…..WTF……I mean *WTF*!!!!!!the visual cliff experiment isn’t really that cruel when you read the actual details. it just tested at what approximate age children develop depth perception, and the children were never in any danger.Two “Disturbing Experiments” I had recognized as Psychology experiments. And as I correct you on these, i’d like for you to do intensive research on what “AllTime10s”s you do, so, without further adieu; 1. The Visual Cliff experiment: the Visual Cliff experiment was initially conducted by Eleanor J. Gibson and R. D. Walk, In short, this experiment was tested on a great my kids in varying ages to determine when the humans Depth Perception begins to develop. Tests on infants only a few months old, the mother would try and coax the child toward her, the are of the visual cliff was a black and white checkered table that drops to form a cliff, glass was then put over the cliff and held in place by a specifically carved frame of the table. Infants, as said before, at a very young age would simply was over the glass in order to get to the parent, and technically, if one seemed as a friend to the infant, could easily make the infant crawl to its own doom, but infants from the age of about 6-8 months began to understand the danger of the cliff whether or not they were to so. Any parent retarded enough to place their child at the edge of a cliff to test if it would walk off deserves to be shot in the genitals a great many times. and 2. The Little Albert experiment: The Little Albert experiment was conducted by John B. Watson and his assistant Rosalie Rayner. This experiment was conducted to determine the conditioning of small children, Little Albert, it is, was given a small white rat, Little Albert was given some time to get acquainted with the rat, seemingly becoming friends, then after some time the experimenters would bang a metal rod behind Albert every time he associated with the white rat. After some time Albert began to fear not only the white rat, but anything that was white and fuzzy, as shown in the picture of the test of Watson wearing a Santa Claus beard and Albert crying out. This experiment could be easily remedied, as Albert, and most small children, had not yet developed their long term memory. And the result of the experiment was labeled Associated Condition, as Little Albert, again, not only feared the white rat, but any white fuzzy things as well.Is it weird if i cried because i think that those things that the people did to the children are horrible and awful? T_T such things should never happen to those poor babies TT_TTHow hard did they hit the baby with the hammer my godIf no one gets the anesthetic one it is because the only reason you are given anesthetic is because you can go into shock and that is dangerous. They thought babies couldn’t go into shock so therefore no anesthetic. They did that to save money, because to some people money is more important then babies.i want to assult ronald mcdonald nowAdBlock… I love you. The music in this video.. I love you. Alltime10s… I love you.the last one was to me abuse. TTTT_______TTTTthis is disturbing and abuse!Has anyone heard of the experiment called “kagome kagome”? in ww2 Germans experimented on Japanese orphans to try to remove the possibility of death from their brains, horribly injuring and killing many this is by far crueler than any of these Vocaloid even made a song about it c:Mind doing actual research before posting a video like this? This is just silly…Wow number one was messed up…. SmhThis is terrible.Sadly i was also experimented on as a child.. women took turns abusing my cock, craving it, using their privates on mines like angry beasts craving their next meal and now it’s oversized compared to a normal man and women want it even more but oddly enough I don’t want it to be 13 inches of man meat and now my life is ruined… I was only a boy of 16 years of age when the abuse started… If only things could of been different.. sigh.You guys should do one that is greatest or longest fights/battles between two individualsA lot of these facts are wrong. (Iv done a lot of projects on this topic)This is horrible! So done-OMG THAT LAST ONE!!! I was born in 1984 and was ill right off the bat. Ever since, I’ve had a fear of needles and doctors… Now I think I know why.Even more disturbing is what they do in russia…cut off limbs of under developed babies…who knows what they use it for…I saw a video with them doing it on some russian website…it was grotesqueFUCK THOSE EXPERIMENTSI can’t unsee this now.Also, the one about Reimer is true, but it wasn’t burned off, the Doctor simply cut too much off… Most of these facts can be found in almost any Psychology text book…Number one is just cruel… who would do that to a baby?Well I’m gonna sleep easy tonight…….Most of these arent even disturbing…Sure, barely explain these experiments and condemn them without mentioning how useful some of them were.Especially the visual cliff one, there wasn’t anything wrong with that experiment at all…That’s cruel… I hope they have more common sense in their brains now…Little Albert: The experimenters were researching phobias and conditioned stimuli and reactions. They only banged a hammer on a metal pole when a little rat was presented to him, he began to fear the rat itself without the bang, the rat became the conditioned stimulus. Also he began to fear similar objects because of stimulus generalisation, not because all of the objects he was presented with afterwards had a bang accompanied with it.Bruce Reiner: God, that makes me depressed. I was told in Psychology class that he eventually married and adopted two kids.The number one spot…ew…That’s f*cked up. Which part? Almost all of it.please go homein number one were the doctors right?What the fuckOmg that’s messed up I’m ashamed to be human DxAnyone know about the children who were given radio active oatmeal? That was awful and done to children in a mental institutechild abuse =|The question is why did I decide to disturb myself with these videos just before going to sleep…well done brain.0:43 lol Albert is my middle name (its why it’s in my username)The num 1 is fucked upI would have thought the anesthetic one would be that it could have damaging effects on developing nerves.Number 7: “…and it was concluded that babies shouldn’t be left near high ledges.” What groundbreaking information.Circumcision is a gross outdated theory that should be illegal.Why… why haven’t I seen any creepypastas based on these?These motherfuckers need Jesus.Everybody hate clowns…Well…fuckHumans are of great beauty, and horrid ugliness.sacrifice a few for the good of the many…I learned about David remer in my psychology class last week. He had a twin and was an infant when he had the sex change. It was years before he knew the truth but he always had a feeling.I am going to be sick for the rest of they day. Hope these bastards go to HELL and get tortured by a bunch of babies ~!!!!! What right does a human have to do this to another human being, even if the said human was just an infant? Sick, just SICK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Number and the one where orphan babies were tested on is sick as hell I hope whoever came up with those ideas is tortured in hell.None of these are bad my mom abuses me more than this.number 10 sound like Lord of the Flies.wow, they did this horrible things to children in the name of scienceShit, the number 1 got me really bad. How could they do such a thing?Got as far as 7. That’s me done.A lot of these are taken significantly out of context. Number 7, for example, was done to see if infants have depth perception despite their vision not being 100% developed. Also, the Little Albert experiment, although it seems cruel, wasn’t traumatizing in any way because the behavior he exhibited from it became extinct after not being reinforced. And then the Bobo the Clown experiment wasn’t on a clown but an inflatable toy clown. This was done to see if children mimic adult behaviors, which it was found that they do.At least go into more detail, dammit.Sure am glad. I wasn’t born in the 50sI didn’t get any of them apart from the “Hammer to head because of objects” oneJesus…The experiments on humans (let alone animals) are worse than I thought…I am so disturbed..but that was interesting.They will go to HELL inshAllah ..Did some research on these. Some of them aren’t nearly as bad as this video is making them out to be. It’s interesting, I encourage you all to research them. Remember, Youtube videos are meant to entertain, not educate. 😛Than God I was born in 198…6!!! Really disturbing!!Than God I was born in 198…6!!! Really disturbing!!I’m in AP psychology, and half of these are framed to look bad or over exaggerated. The visual cliff experiment didn’t harm a child… it’s main goal was to see if babies have depth perception. #5 “Home Economics” actually benefited the children. The child’s care was top priority, and many arrived with malnutrition but was quickly brought to good health. And with the Bobo doll experiment, the clown was a clown DOLL. Nobody was hurt.I’m in AP psychology, and half of these are framed to look bad or over exaggerated. The visual cliff experiment didn’t harm a child… it’s main goal was to see if babies have depth perception. #5 “Home Economics” actually benefited the children. The child’s care was top priority, and many arrived with malnutrition but was quickly brought to good health. And with the Bobo doll experiment, the clown was a clown DOLL. Nobody was hurt.welll that that escalated quickly….welll that that escalated quickly….I thought little Albert was conditioned to be scared of furry animals, not objects. At least that’s what they taught us on our psychology course…I thought little Albert was conditioned to be scared of furry animals, not objects. At least that’s what they taught us on our psychology course…Number 1 yes agree with you. it was the worst oneIt’s obvious that most of these facts are caused by psychology use.number five is really fucked upthe babies looked so cuteDont believe everything you see on utube.Whoever did that to the infant on number 8, what kind of man are you? Stupid stupid person.#9 is my love #2 proves that monkeys do what they seeBecause so many people are interested/horrified by the number one on this video, I wanted to provide some context. Babies were NEVER given anesthesia before 1986. This wasn’t an experiment, it was just common practise. Doctors were under the assumption that babies had immature nervous systems and therefore could not feel pain. They were given a strong muscle relaxer, but that’s it. Medical professionals thought that the pain reactions babies gave were just the baby imitating what they saw others do. All the surgeries given to newborn babies, up until one year, were life saving. Horrific and ignorant, but still life saving. Many people who were operated on as babies go to PTSD groups because they feel the after effects of such trauma.Seven wasn’t horribly disturbing. I mean, that’s nothing like two or one.Number 1: why are people such sick,thoughtless bastardsWTF WAS WRONG WITH DOCTORS BEFORE 1985I just watched a documentary on the experiment where they were trying to make children stutter thru correcting them in a VERY HARSH way… they did this every single time they spoke… all day long for a very long period of time…. and NOT ONE of the children went away with a stutter… but they did go away with severe emotional trauma… that lasted a life time…. I think that there are one or two children from that study that are still alive…The baby’s eyes in 1:00That last one was really fuck up!!!!!!!!!!Woa poor david… mankind is really disgusting sometimes8 is the meanest I mean you put a bunch of stuff he’s not supposed touch in front of him. Then when he touches it you whack him in the head with a HAMMER! I mean come people he’s not even 5 and ADULTS that’s right responsible adults hit a kid less then 5 with a hammer just because he touched something! I mean its not like he broke anything plus even if he did that’s not nice to HIT A KID LESS THEN 5 WITH A GOD DAM HAMMEROH FUCK! That last oneLittle Albert and the Cliff experiment were both simple psychological studies. Also Little Albert wasn’t given “various objects”, it was a rodent. They conditioned Albert to be scared of rodents. And he would have been FINE if the mother would have let psychologists uncondition him. As for the Cliff experiment, it was simply proof that children will trust their mother’s intuition above their own. Nothing disturbing about that, especially since the “cliff” was competely safe.The Bobo the Clown experiment was on a clown TOY, not an actual clown. Just felt like clarifying that.what the fuckThis is what we do to each other “IN THE NAME OF SCIENCE”. SMH What are they doing NOW that we don’t know about.Ur dumb shutupHighly inaccurate. Thanks youtube.That last one was fucked up.What about the experiment someone did were they took children and made sure they had no interaction with humans to see the effects. I don’t remember all of it but i’m pretty sure he did that.“Sometimes science has to do questionable things to get results”….has to do things?…. No… there is no reason for these things…wheres Shigesato Itoi’s disturbing child hood he saw a movie that scars him and made the game earthbound and made the final boss giygas because of the movie he saw?you know what is more disturbing… this video playing by itself when i’m alone cleaning my room… that was freaking scarysick bastards.. omg I cryedSome of these are inaccurate or lack a part of the story. I just recently learned about the Little Albert experiment in my psychology class around a week ago.broken toy wtf.The last one isn’t as bad as it might be. Assuming the babies were worked on before a certain time after birth, they shouldn’t even be aware of themselves. Whether pain is linked to that or not, I can’t even remember anything from before I was 5. They’ll get over it. That is my personal, uneducated opinion. Feel free to enlighten me on the subject.David Reimer= proof that gender identity isnt a choice no matter if you have male or female genitals.…uhh, dafuq did i just watch…In David Reimer, how could doctors burn off the penis when they use a blade?What if they conducted the SPARTAN ORION project from HALO?What’s wrong with the guilt experiment with the broken toy? It teaches a desire to make amends for one’s wrongdoings. People these days are too self-entitled, and they don’t give a rat’s hat about other people.it’s so scarey e.eI like to memorize and regurgitate these facts for when I’m at drunken gathering… Quiet funny lol… until they call me a liar, that’s when the Ultra-violence begins…kids+spartan expirement=Halo in real life 🙂You see people, this is why we experiment in animals. Case solved.the first is just OMFG! Luckily I wasn’t born in the Fuckhole States of America before the 1985sYou sir, are fucking retarded. Animals should not be experimented on either (reply toKiwiNurdee1). Let’s experiment on your bass that sounds like fun.really a HAMMER against an infants head?!here’s one that belonged on the list in concentration camps in nazi occupied poland and germany, they would do experiments on children and twins where they would sew them together and see how long they could survive that way. ((along with this, many other horrific experiments and testes were done, like lampshades and purses out of human skin))well number 8 is bullshit it was just an inflatable clown doll not an actual person dressed as a clown like this implies. But all the others are saddeningly legit 🙁trash videos that just exagerate’s and states so many things incorrectly to fool the idiot’s on the internet. Has no sources in the link, complete trash videos. Vsauce is the only accurate/legit video maker on youtube.What happened with number five? I didn’t see the disturbing part. What happened?And then they pretend you are bad for swearing or taking a puff off a joint.are you fucking serious?! they thought it was ok to operate on babies without anesthetic!!!!!O-O holy fuck number one… WHAT THE HELL?Understand what Im saying. The only way to learn something is through trial and error. The results can be disturbing but if it leads to improving ourselves so that we dont make the same mistakes again.Humans suck back thenInteresting, but the clip itself was fucking terrible!This is why experiments in general should be illegal! People are idiotic beasts!Number 3 sucksi dont get number 7sick!!!!!!!!!!!!!These are all horrific enough but the last one is even more dreadful.this is directly SICK.WTF, those people were sick to even try that shits…#10 Lord of the Flies?These people have mental problem.Don’t forget unit 731 by the japs. They would experience on children, pregnant women, the elderly etc. They would infect them with various diseases. Torture them. RApe them. They would remove children stomach and continue feeding them to see what would happen. Read up on it.i was once an abused child….How is 10 even an experiment? That’s just youth before the 2000’s. I don’t see the big deal.I likedf the video overall but disliked some of your information manipulation in order to make some of the experiments seem far worse than they wereThe last one is completely fucked up..It is sick to see how evil humans can be, all in the name of science!we are ruled by sick and evil people this shouldn’t happen.I’m sure it still does happen in some countries. Anyway in my country we are medicating our children from the time they are born if you let them drink the tap water cause its all highly fluoridated, I won’t let my kids drink the tap water, its poison.Why does people say that circumcision is healthy???How fucked up are 3 & 1? How hilarious is 2?Number ten is sparta idiots could have just opened a book to get their results.Number 1 is fucking awful.Some of these experiments seem like terrible excuses to just be cruel. Putting a baby next to an object and then creating a loud noise is going to scare the child? I thought that could be common sense. Since these experiments are documented so we know about their existance, it should be obvious that these things have these results. You also don’t need to be a genius to understand that babies aren’t mature enough to know the consequences of being near a cliff and will walk right off. These aren’t experiments with medication or anything, they just seem kind of dumb…you forgot one of the nazi experiments (the creepypasta one)lol babys falling off a cliff..lol seriously? LADYS WHO HAVE CHILDREN DONT DO THAT!!! XDOn 0:45 A KID WOULD GET HIT WITH A HAMMER! I GO BACK IN TIME AND TAKE THAT HAMMER AND SMACK THEM WITH THE BACK OF THE HAMMER ON THEIR FOR HEAD AND TWIST IT AND SAVE THE BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!This…… Is fucked up.Okay… you REALLY REALLY REALLY need to get your facts a little straighter. These were dramatized and plain false in most cases.This is straight up creepypasta material o-oThis guys are fucked upYou’re calling me a hippy? You fucking serious right now?? I’m no hippy, im just someone who loves animals and doesn’t like the thought of them suffering. It’s not like I go out and hug trees or somethingSeven isn’t completely accurate.. The visual cliff experiment was done with a sheet of Plexiglas that was placed over a 2 ft drop. This video showed an ‘actual’ cliff, somehow insinuating that babies were experimented on in a way that would induce fear. The point of the experiment was to see if it was instinctual to avoid ledges. It was disproved, as the very young infants went over the glass any way. Those over a year old wouldn’t go across.I know it’s not a huge deal, but the way that this was portrayed seems dishonest, despite the fact that it’s purely for entertainment value.Don’t worry, the experiments were performed by professionals in nice, clean, white lab coats in the name of ‘science’ so it’s all ok. :\Seriously F—ed Up people, Doesn’t it just show you there is something seriously wrong with governments that allowed this?WHAT!!!!!!!!!? THEY SMASHED A HAMMER AT THE 11 MONTH OLD INFANT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!? THEYRE PSYCHOPATHSnumber 1 is so sadugh yea wtf were the scientists thinking ?! ummm maim, your child died because we didnt think he could feel pain and we kinda cut his stomach open…. so yea, it was all in the name of science?That’s terrible and horrifying, how could a human being do something like that to an innocent child ?Three words: What the fuck!For number 2 it was a clown doll… This was shown to prove the layman’s concept of “monkey see, monkey do” otherwise known as observational learning. Oh and in guessing for the first they also didn’t want to kill the kids by having them OD on morphine. Besides do you ever really remember anything that happened to you beyond the age of three? If you do make sure you find Philip Zombardo (crazy bastard that did the Stanford prison study and wrote the psych 102 book I’m reading) and tell him to rewrite his book in your namesick,,,, but a lot of these facts are a little off… there was a lot more to some of them, but good to get vids like these out to show what the gov are capable ofRepent of your sins and accept Yahusha as Lord and Savior.+CrazyCreeper that is something we must forgetAll of these are sensationalized.Some of these I can understand. I think there were like 3 that I thought shouldve been tested. But certainly not all.THAT IS SOOOOOO FUCKED UPThese are very interesting studies (except #1 which seems like a sadistic practice). Although cruel in nature, can help humanity better understand itself. Some people do terrible things for science, but many more people shun it.Psychology wouldn’t be where it is if people didn’t practice the perverse experiments they did, changing people to their core and in some cases, creating monsters. It’s not something I endorse but I understand its necessity.and this is why im against sciencewow without anesthetic wtf manRight now those kids could’ve lived a good life. Maybe one could be a celebrity, hero or a Noble price winner 🙁What am I doing watching thisI chuckled for the 1st onethe last one made me cry…WTF IMEN WTF YOU LET A BABY CRAWL OF A CLIFF THEY SHOULD BE A SHAMEDThat first one made me laugh uncontrollably. It was kinda amusing and funny.I find it ironic that there’s people saying “FUCK SCIENCE” when they are most likely using a computer or an iphoneWow, wow, what’s with people blaming Science and Scientists here? These people are just sickos, don’t blame it on ALL Scientists.Someone even said ‘Scientists have no souls like Nazis’. What the hell? Fuck all of you guys. Without these ‘Evil Scientists’ testing things like these you’d be dead or in agony unless you were rich or were very resilient which I doubt most of these people are. Sometimes people have to do inhuman things to help humanity in the long run.And no, I’m not saying that the things shown in the video are fine, I’m just saying don’t blame all the Scientists for shit like this happening.😉I’m surprised they didn’t add Kagome Kagome to the list.Even if they won’t go into shock, why let them suffer? Damn.Human being is sick.People are so stupid and cold-hearted. They must have nothing to do with their time to hurt and kill.Where’s Pavlog? He did the same thing he did to dogs to children.I have to agree with number 2, seriously, fuck clowns.Are these people stupid, mean or both? Oh my God…These are experiences that was never needed to be done. Like really? Leave a kid next to a cliff to see what happens and to see you shouldn’t leave a baby unattended next to it? Omg how dumb. And why put a baby through so much pain just for experience of heart surgery. Omg that must have really hurted. So sad what babies have to go through and still to this day still have to go through. Fucking sick.Why does the human race act so cruel to its own do we not think of anyone but ourselves?I’m actually not watching, I dragged the screen down ‘cos I’m 13 and don’t really want to know.Man people are sick.wtfThat #1 experiment, “Anesthetic” was ESPECIALLY disturbing! That “experiment” is…..just…..horrid! How can people DO that?!?!?!?!?Omg that’s terrible ugh I hate some ppm and rally why babies what did they do to diserve that stuffGotta be heartless to do experiments on kidsKill one save a million.Welp, I think I just killed off enough of my soul for one day. Time for some kitten videos to restore my faith in something other than humanityYour #4 is actually misinterpreted. In Psychology “negative reinforcement” is not punishment. Negative reinforcement is the act of taking away something bad from a child as a reward, while positive reinforcement is giving something good to a child as a reward. I mean we know what we’re all talking about here, but I thought you might want to know that for the future.got sources???Ok i know it’s called the BOBO doll experiment, but you should still let people know that the clown they beat up was a doll. Not an actual clown.;oGod 3Fascism isn’t neccesarily “malevolent”, moron. very niceMostly number 1…It’s crazy how stupid humans were, and not even that long ago.loving the song what is the name of it ?Why would slam a hammer against a baby’s head?how come ive only like seen 3 comments so far about the children in the holocaust? I mean some children were sterilized by having x-rays directly exposed to their genitaliaAah, I think I’ve heard something about #9. After WWII, a teacher turned his class into a Nazi-like group as an experiment. The kids knew it was fake all along, but didn’t know who the experiment was modeled after. It started with jut calling the teacher “sir”, and the class thought it was funny. However, it escalated over a while (the version I knew was one month) and by the end of it, they were pretty much practicing Nazism. At the end of it all, the teacher realizes how insane it was getting, and offers to show the students and their “followers” (the whole thing escalated far beyond their class) a recording of their “leader”. The teacher then showed a recording of Hitler to show them all just what they looked like. In real life, the teacher was expelled and sued.There was a short film on it… does anyone know the name?THAT LAST INE THOUGH !!!!!!!!! … MOM MORE BROWNIES ………. !!!!!!!*AssumeNumber one was just so fucked up! I mean, I can kind of understand that happening 100 years ago (still fucked up though.) But until 1985?! What the actual fuck? Even if they don’t go into shock you’re still hurting babies when you operate on them without anesthetic! It doesn’t take a Doctor to figure that out! The “practicing different parent methods” one didn’t seem that bad, actually. Unless they were beating the shit out of them or otherwise abusing them. I mean, I would have just examined parents who were already raising kids and just examined all the different methods that way, but still.The Holocaust children experiments would give you nightmares though. Now that was plain fucked up!WOW #10.poor clown got raped by babies.,.Actually, with the little Albert experiment, he was conditioned to fear white rats specifically. They didn’t deem it to be all they bad cause he was an orphan :/ and with the cliff experiment, they also tested it with various newbornish animals, and came to the conclusion that young animals and infants know when there is a cliff and that they should stay away from it, common results being that they would back away crying, refusing to go near itthat is sickWe shouldn’t let babies near high cliffs? WE KNOW THAT NOW THANKS TO THE EXPERIMENTSomg! the last one is just cruel! D:#2 is funny but mest up at the same time.Number seven is inaccurate. The visual cliff experiment was done by psychologist Eleanor J. Gibson in the 20th century to see if babies had depth perception. The cliff was AN ILLUSION. Overall it was concluded that babies do have depth perception because they wouldn’t walk out from the cliff.………..FOR SCIENCEI can felt pain as an adult the first day I was born.the first one was disturbing, and the one where the poor baby was changed genitals..other than that the rest of the experiments were described here out of context, and they weren’t exactly done how this video describes it. take psy courses and you can understand a little more of why the experiments were done and how exactlyi read a book about #9, it was called The Wave. i always thought it was fiction thoughWTF?@_@ Confused. Thought I’d see more Holocaust-related experiments..10 is just… JERKS PIECES OF CRAP PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO SOULS AND LIKE TO KILL BABIES AND NEED TO BE TIED TO A SLOW EATING ZOMBEY AND CUT THERE HANDS AND FEET OFF AND LET THEM ROT.When I first clicked on it OK I’M OUT OF HEREnvm but I stopped by TWOBastards!That last one is just evil I feel for those poor children ouch.Why is there nothing about GenieMost of these experiments lead to better understanding of children development. Cruel but necessary I would say.THIS WORLD IS GOING TO HELL, THIS IS THE DEVIL’S WORKHow could these people do that to the innocent kids.I can hardly even hurt a fly well along a child.babies shouldn’t be near high edges, YOU DON’T FUCKING SAY?I was not aware science views human life as a commodity with no intrinsic value.Also,THANKS OBAMAi’m about to cry.Why did I watch this right before going to bed?? LmaoDafuq did I just watch! o.OWho is this sick people that does this?!?!!!This ain’t science, this is just evil. I couldn’t stand of those of the early days.who gets of on this I am outFor the sake of science ehh?The last one is fucked up and totally unjustifiable. I can’t believe it happened in 1984, what the fuck humanity!thats fucked upand they always go away with it……..Alas!……….sorry…………this world is only for powerful,The cliff one wasn’t exactly disturbing; it wasn’t endangering the child in any way and was actually (or most likely) to prove that infants have no depth perceptions. Not to point out the obvious point that they shouldn’t be left near edges. The list only states points of the experiment that make it seem stupid, but even the description doesn’t make it seem disturbing whatsoever.This is just terribleOmg! :'( how can be people do that to children and babiesWhat is child-rearing?7 isn’t nearly as bad as the others, just plain dumb.…Everyone who did these experiments must DIEWhat the fuck is wrong with human? Especially the last one…i do like your videos and i find them pretty interesting but do you spend so much time just finding out facts? Well, whether you do or not, your videos are pretty coolomg my aunt had open heart surgery after birthWow I wish Aliens will invade us already!people are so stupid even the cliff thing their going to the devilScrew human3 i cant even talk about how bad that is, thats cruel time 100 or moreNumber 10 is blown way out of proportion he made two camps of boys who showed to be upstanding good kids but didn’t tell them about each other and had them get close through working together. He the told them about the other group and had them participate in competitions he wasn’t expecting them to become violent. He then had both groups work together to see if this interaction could be repaired and found having a common goal was a very effective way to bridge this divide.Compared to how horrible some of these other are it shouldn’t even be on the list neither should BoBo he’s like a physiologist mascot it’s not a “clown” it’s a inflatable clown doll that sits up when you hit it by a weight in the bottom.(which we make as toys for the purpose of being hit) The goal of BoBo was to show how much effect actions adults did had on kids, which it did proving things like parents fighting each other was very negative on the child and a huge leap in child psychology.*cough* thisisjustsickandtwisted *cough*Number 8 particularly got me. All he’s trying to do is play with these toys he’s been given. What exactly does that experiment result in? 🙁SICK….1 # made me mad…..what kinda people would do that?!Who would even think of performing surgery on a baby without anesthesia? It’s a shame that some of the sickest minds known to mankind are allowed to be exposed to people. If there are doctors who would do this…….. no words.What the actual fuck #1If I had any pateince for humanity left this ruins it all….. Humans are only just dicks, they will do anything for “fun”#’2 I am scared of clowns, so good on them.Who ever thought about #1 needs to die a long painful death!:0The child rearing one wasn’t too bad, I mean, it is definitely not preferred, but compared to the some of the other ones on the list, it is perfectly fine.I was successfully procrastinating the next four hours of paperwork I have to do until I saw this disgusting video. Granted abuses of power are frequently disgusting, but, this pushed my limits and I have to go back to being a drone that makes unreasonably vast amounts of paper soaked in ink, because paper soaked in ink is worth 3/4 of all of our lifespans ‘just cuz money over bitches’ right!? Nah rly tho i’m way overpaid and I’m well aware of it, the world’s fucked up lets get real I still got friends that owe over 100 grand to schools when i dropped out freshman year and thank god i did, the US got some real issues to addressthose did this exp are everything but not humanI think what should had been on the Top Spot .. now be prepared..how that fucking Nazi Mengele sewed Twins on their Backs together and crossed their Bloodstreams, to see how that would work out, 4 Painful Days later they died. Or he injected chloroform into the Hearts of Children while they were Alive… truly horrific, i really hope hell exists and that fuck suffers forever for what he did back then.holy cow, number one O.Othat is disgusting those poor kids how dare the adults treat them so badly3 is a fallacy. There had been countless sex changes in similar scenarios beforehand. Such sex changes do work if done early enough, because of the gender ambiguity of infants (Hence males having nipples) The reason it did not work for David Reimer was because the operation was performed unusually late in development, due to a late circumcision.Flipping……..just…….What the heck?!This is too screwed up.that last one is fucked upNo. 7 NO DIPI laughed at number 2 :p Fuck clowns!Oh my lord, number 1 was the one got me feeling upset and angry that doctors would do such a horrible thingWasn’t there a Nazi scientist/doctor who tried to sow two children together?Liked this video for the information……but my God I can understand the dislikes, some of this shit is fucked up! I do also question the truth to some of these top 10s also. I really would like for someone to give me a source proving this isn’t true, but from the sheer support on these vids, it doesn’t seem likely.#’s 3 &1 – are the most sickening revelations of this Nazi-led society!How are they not sued??Okay, it’s time for My Little Pony.I imagine theres far worse, i was quite surprised how tame it was overall.Lol the third study was used to originally back the trans-gender movement.I dont care about the children the people who did it will be tortured in hell and the kids will have a better life with godThank you science I didn’t know if you put a baby by a cliff he will fall of who’s the douchbag scientist that came up with thatThe most depressing vid everOkay, the ” visual cliff” wasn’t so bad. The way I heard it, the cliff was covered in sturdy plexiglas or the like and was quite safe to bear a baby’s weight. But OH MY GOD number 1. How could ANYONE do that to a child? To keep working on them, hearing their constant screams of agony… Those poor, poor babies. I only hope they didn’t remember the pain after.What does agony mean?Truely horrible.Lol, was I the only one not disturbed?I have 5 words SOME PEOPLE ARE FUCKED UP#4 The Monster Study is not entirely true… Wendell Johnson did perform this experiment however it didn’t go as he expected. Things that were wrong about information in the video: 1. There were actually 4 groups not only 2… Group IA, Group IB, Group IIA, Group IIB. 2. The study did not go the way they planned. The only significant changes were to Group IIA. Other groups nothing significant actually happened. 3. Group IIA didn’t even get a stutter, they just hated talking because they were told they have a “stutter” (they actually didn’t), and they were told when they talk it was bad. 4. No one, who had a stutter, got rid of their stuttering through this experiment. 5. No one, who didn’t have a stutter, developed a stutter. 6. 3 people from the Group IIA filed a law suit and sued the State of Iowa and the University of Iowa. Conclusion: The experiment failed. The only significant changes were on Group IIA. They didn’t even develope a stutter, they only developed a anti-social personality. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/16/magazine/the-stuttering-doctor-s-monster-study.htmlALL PUNCH THE CLOWN!the last one shocked me1985?!!Some people don’t deserve to live.All they do is poison the world.Poor kids 🙁Check out some of these things and get the facts, this guy doesn’t know what he is talking about for most of these. For example, little Albert was yes an infant to toddler and he was not given various objects but a mouse/rat. They then rang a bell from the rafters at random times when he played with the rat randomly. This then led for him to be afraid of rats and types of facial hair.In highschool we learned about the Bobo experiment except the clown was a doll-like punching bagPeople say child experiment #1 is bad and inhumane, yet abortion is in full practice in north america…Hypocrites.Im going to try all of these thinf on my childrendidn’t seem that bad…These are f up peoplethose basterdsThe one with the kids assaulting the clown isnt true. The experiment actually has kids in a room with an adult assaulting a doll. In another room, there are kids with an adult, and the adult ignores the doll. When the kids are dealt with frustration by the experimenter, the kids in the room with the adult assaulting the doll showed more aggression than the ones that had the adult that ignored the doll.I had surgery on my eye in 1967 without anesthetic. I was 18 months old. My mother told me about it, but I have no memory of it.just….why?? Why would people…. humans are evil… it official.4 word’s: Fucking Sick Fuck Cunt’sWhen Dr Halsey kidnapped 6 year olds, and trained them to be super soldiers+moonpelt IkrI don’t condone any of this but guys these people weren’t all trying to be malicious with what they did to these children. These were experiments, not attempts to be sadists. If anything else it helped the people of that time learn more about how to and not to raise or treat a child.Just saying, I truly don’t think these people just wanted to torture children, even though it is horrible what happened to them.On babies :”O im crying right know :((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((“””That’s just not right…7:…and that took a test to conclude?Why are these children do this stuff?!! Are children Now D CLASS! Working for the foundation!youtube you are something else i was just watching some dance video now this 🙁there is a book about numer 9 its called the waveNumber 2 I could of told you that would have happened. These are not the worse ones trust me what about the experiment where young girls would be purposely abused so they can develop a split personality.1: WHAT THE FUCKSo, You’re sources for these test experiements?THOSE PEOPLE ARE DOWN RIGHT FUCKED UP!!!THOSE PEOPLE ARE DOWN RIGHT FUCKED UP!!!Just….Torture…Just….Torture…1- FUCK those people who did that to babies1- FUCK those people who did that to babiesThis is why us humans deserve to rot in he’ll at times. Doing this to innocent babies. Bull is what I call. Science? Please.This is why us humans deserve to rot in he’ll at times. Doing this to innocent babies. Bull is what I call. Science? Please.The ones where they changed them forever was just morbid. How could someone teach a baby to be scared of common objects? How could you operate on babies without pain killers? HOOW.The ones where they changed them forever was just morbid. How could someone teach a baby to be scared of common objects? How could you operate on babies without pain killers? HOOW.does the rest of you think that num 7 was one of the most…. horrendous things you have ever heard of…?i am appalled that they would even think of trying that!scratch that… num 1 is the most satanic thing i have ever seen!There’s a difference between being evil and being ignorant.The 1 give me a boner.You what annoyed me about this video. The people making this video left some very important information about some of the experiment. For example: Bobo’s doll experiment. No one actually beat up a clown. It was a doll! A Bobo doll dressed like a clown not an actual clown! Granted there was something wrong with that experiment. The children did not know they were in an experiment, that would not be allowed today.Another one that annoyed me was with the Robber’s Cave experiment, whilst i’m justifying it, they did leave out the end detail. At one point the kid’s bus broke down (on purpose) and the fighting factions actually united, stopped fighting and fixed the bus. It showed that a good way to end conflict is to find a common problem and untie to fix it. I bet they left that detail out on purpose just to make this video fell all that more sinister. If you ask me that’s kinda dishonest.In defence of modern day psychologist can I say: This wouldn’t happen today. Those were psychology’s dark days, nowadays the APA and other Psychological societies, like the APS, have standards that would prevent such thing from happening.“and it was concluded that babies shouldn’t be left near edges”. No shit!When you bang a baby with a hammer, won’t he/she die? .___.7…DUHHH!!!ITS A FUCKING COMMONSENSE!!no Josef fucking mengele??? that Nazi experimented on children as a job, like injecting them with viruses and diseases to see the affects and he also disfigured and conjoined children together to see if both could feel pain at the same time… that sick evil bastard deserves #1The problem with eight (little Albert) was that the psychologists weren’t able to ‘uncondition’ him afterwards so he ended up being afraid of fluffy objects (similar properties to a white rat) for the rest of his life. Experiments like these are why Ethics is a big thing in the psychological community. If you want another ethically awful one (on young adults) try Zimbardos prison experiment.It’s horrible to think what was going on in their minds, especially babies because they don’t know what’s going on! 🙁Poor babys 🙁 I feel like I wanna cry.I’m gonna go back to 1985 and slap those doctorsthey were psychological experiments come on guys take a psychology classMuch worse tests are being done on non-human animals even today, and hardly anybody gives a shit. Hypocrisy at it’s finest.#1 W T F WAS THATMost disturbing, this cool, little reggae trumpet music over the top of something sinister, you just creeped me out:)poor babies 🙁How about fluoridated water and toxic useless vaccines, junk food, television and now internet ?#7 I actually learned about this in Human Development and an infant knows when there’s a drop and won’t just keep aimlessly wandering over a cliff/table edge/chair. And with that I’m going to call misinformation / intentionally vague on the rest of these.I don’t get #5… :/Remember, it’s all in the name of science…. Right?holy crap my son just went through heart surgery … I can only imagine how much blood would be on my hands once i found out what those doctors did to him without anesthesiaWTF AMERICAlike if no.1 pissed you offWTF IS WRONG WITH US!?!?!?Well I guess all the initial crying before the shock wasn’t a good indication of all the freaking pain the baby was in. I wish to do open heart surgery on all of those doctors sans pain meds. Of course it isn’t like they have really changed, They don’t give adequate pain meds for circumcision and the baby goes into shock then the nurse tells the parent’s he “slept through it”3 was the worstI think I lost my respect for the past doctors.Whoa holy fucking shit.as a clarification, in the bobo doll experiment, a clown doll was used rather than a clown, which while still wrong, isn’t nearly as bad as assaulting an actual clown http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Bobo_doll-en.svgWild animals don’t even do this crap to their babies. We humans are truly horrible creatures.why does alltime10s never talk?1:19 no duh.. Who in they’re right mind leaves a baby near a cliff!yeah if you’ve had a bad childhood I don’t recommend watching this or have had bad childhood experiences I don’t recommend watching thisI don’t like the baby ones. I can’t handle it.But why am I still watching this? 🙁Those poor inncocent little babies… :OOIts funny to see all these comments about number 1 but no ones gives a fuck about number 3.The name of the science won’t restore this poor kids… man that one number 3 is a living nightmare.what the fuck.. sorry for the language but What the fuck!!! what are they thinking!!!some people were sick in the early-mid 20th century.poor david reimer… search on youtube his history.. its depressing.THAT’S JUST FUCKING MESSED UP!!!What the fuck is wrong with people these days. They need help. This is just fucking jacked up.They seriously had to do an experiment to decide you shouldn’t leave babies near high edges….10 Disturbing Child Experimentsif i were david reimer i would fucking kill my parents.Humans find it hard to relate to anything they can not communicate with. from Animals to babiesTo me the number 3 with David Reimer doesn’t sound like an experiment, but more like an accident.I think the cliff one should have been 10 as the others where far worse, at least safety was considered in that one.The people who performed these experiments are 1. Assholes 2. Assholes or 3. Assholes Wow, I can’t believe the doctors would do that to those infants, it’s quite obvious that it would cause them physical pain. Every experience shapes a person even if you don’t remember it, it will still effect your outcome. That’s about as inhuman as it gets.Also I feel people are disliking this video for the wrong reasons.What about the MK Ultra trials done in seven year olds in the 1960s?some sick people you get 🙁2:39 I guess clowns are its….lol clownsglad I never needed surgery as a baby. That’s just sickall of them are sadIn case no-one else has said it. There is a novel named “The Wave” which was based on #9.That last one makes me fukin suckThat was.. How should I put this… DISTURBING. The title says it all kids!!!1:22 This one was just plain cruel.The information about some of these experiments in this video are wrong…all of those were just sick.No. 6 was so cruel…These experiments are the result of progressive infiltration into government. Notice the dates. These atrocities didn’t start until right after the end of WWII and just a few years after everyone ran into Berlin and smuggled out every Nazi scientist they could get their hands on. There was an explosion of research into human programming being conducted by every power of the world. Socialism is evil because the individual’s rights are less important that the greater good. Under a constitutional system, it’s the opposite. The rights of an individual are protected over the impassioned desires of the mob.type i do hospitals have a right to have your child put to death is happens right here in Ga.#3 was fucked up i would have cut off the male doctors dick and killed my selfHang every last scientist who even socked a little kid!Hang every last scientist who even socked a little kid!These experiments are unethical, I agree, but to call them “disturbing” as if they were a part of horror agenda is an overestimation I should say.These experiments are unethical, I agree, but to call them “disturbing” as if they were a part of horror agenda is an overestimation I should say.the thumbnail reminded me of the human centipede ;-;the thumbnail reminded me of the human centipede ;-;i got realy pissed at the end why the fuck would you do some fucked up shit like mani got realy pissed at the end why the fuck would you do some fucked up shit like manwell… that was … well… disturbing …well… that was … well… disturbing … I would totally scare the shit out of a baby for science because babies totally don’t have feelings or feel pain even though that the doctors were baby’s before it makes sense not babies have emotions and can feel pain so why not preform heart surgery on it it’s young it won’t feel anything they said it won’t go into shock it should be illegal if it still going on and making a baby walk off a fucking cliff really I would totally scare the shit out of a baby for science because babies totally don’t have feelings or feel pain even though that the doctors were baby’s before it makes sense not babies have emotions and can feel pain so why not preform heart surgery on it it’s young it won’t feel anything they said it won’t go into shock it should be illegal if it still going on and making a baby walk off a fucking cliff reallysadsadCool… kids as labratsCool… kids as labratsand these idiots are called “researchers”..the fact that the thumbnail is also disturbingi mean shit i wouldn’t mind being a subject in number 10 lolnumber 1 was not even a experiment it was just cheap people not wanting to waist anistesa so they made babies suffer insteadAnd those are 10 reasons out of billions of why humans should be erased from the EarthI hate the human race.Aw the poor babiesAnd this is how the so called “researchers” are assholesJu proably not red tis coment help i plai fifa an i like pewdiepie my sistur has downs an i ned monei se alsho havs te elepantits so i ned monei to bui she medisin…………….. if ju not wach an subcribe me i mine sister die!!!!!! if ju not subcribe an wach my sistur die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! vach my vidos an subcribe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! liek tis poster also!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I genuinely can’t understand how anybody could hurt or terrify or traumatize an innocent child and not die of guilt.And then we wonder why so many people are fucked up…omg that is so sad them bitches who done that. how about you live a normal life?!Omg no.1 is just awful! Those poor babies. Also in no.2, if nowdays kids watch shootings and murders on tv..would that mean they grow up having a different more open acceptance of itDR. Mengele shold have been on that list…This was really bad. I feel bad for the kids.number 1, even if that was true and babies couldn’t go into shock, why the hell would you want a baby to be in agony anyways!!? Cheap motherfuckers. I honestly wouldn’t mind cutting there chest open, see how they like it. It just makes me so angry when people hurt children. It fucking blows my mind that people, especially doctors can be that stupid.THAT’S HORRIBLE!!!!!!! D,,,,:The funniest experiment of all of these is the Sandy Hook experiments where tthey demonstrate on how bullet proof kids are. LOLOL FUNNY AS HELLHoly Curd, I can’t believe adults were that evil and stupid back then, what in all levels of Hell made these idiots think that these experiment were a good idea?HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!No offense but you wrote the opposite experiment for the monster studythe poor clown, oh my god???THATS TERRIBLE! (Except for the clown experiment. LOL)omg……..wtfOh god.Don’t worry people; the clown was just a doll, not a real one.OMG isn’t number 10 a movie based on it???2:32 That’s not disturbing, that’s hilarious!don’t you just hate it when you’re watching a video and Jeff the Fucking Killer COMES UP BESIDE YOU!!!The last one really is sad 🙁I don’t care what you religious nutjobs fucking say, after watching this video, this is proof that there is no God if he allowed that shit to fucking happen to kids and babies.Who would be like that. They are so mean to the little kids and babiesAnd yet another video where the comments section is filled with a generalized hate for humanity. Yes, these acts were atrocious, but that doesn’t mean you should say things like “doctors are evil” or “omgz peple r evil!! we shuld die!” Many of you don’t even think before you post…and yet it’s the Internet, where you have that luxury literally everywhere you go. Just remember, that for every ONE miserable atrocity that’s done by humanity, there’s millions of miracles that we do.Sorry for being so off topic, but it’s now a pet peeve when people immediately type in that people should all go to hell for just a few bad acts done in history. 🙂in little albert, he did not smash a hammer against the child’s head. he simply made the child touch things, and then after the touch, made them touch it again with a banging noise as the child touched it again, to see if he was sensitive to sounds. BULLSHIT HE TRIED BANGING HAMMERS AGAINST A BABYS HEAD FOR GOSH SAKES HE WOULD HAVE DIED WHEN THE HAMMER HIT HIM!how could these people live with themselves after abusing a small child?this is so sadnumber one made me cry cuz i got a baby broNo.didnt need to sleepTHE FREAKING LAST ONE MADE ME SOBI want down people down who ever does this to babies.Circumcision itself is a disturbing child experiment done each year to thousands of babies in this country, in the name of “God” or “cleanliness”.I had dental teeth pulled out as kid and I get flashbacks when visit dentist as adult. All because it hurt and the blood was all over . I had club foot surgery since 8 mths old and I wonder if I was awake and as got older the surgery was finder with sleeping aid and one surgery was 8 hrs and the irony now is I work in hospitals due to fact half my life was in hospitals.. I am going ask my mom if my infant surgical was done awake… the horror if it was.Ik that this is bad (which it is) but you all jump to childrens defences in this situation but as soon as you see one on the Internet you tear them apart :/The second experiment didn’t seem to mention that the clown that the adults were hitting was a toy. This was a test to see if the kids were naturally aggressive, as well as influenced by watching adults. There was a separate group in that study where the kids saw adults be gentle with the clown toy, and the kids were also gentle with it .Question: Why would some sick fucking idiots make experiments on babies?!number three “david reimer” very sadSo nothing about Project MKUltra then? You know, where the US government took children and trained them to be sex slaves and assassins?number one made me sickOh man, a shocking video about horrible people. . . Better make a comment like “I hate humanity” “There is no God”-_-Humanity at its lowest point!Number 8 was in my 11th grade psychology textbook as a first chapter about conditioning. There really isn’t anything wrong with that one.#7 waiting for why did the experiment “it’s concluded babies should not be left by high places” I’m like DUUHH!!!!!!!! FRICKEN IDIOTS!!OMG 3 poor DavidThe last one omg wtf. Q_QIt’s funny as a student of Psychology I know the reasoning behind most of these experiments (not all I grant you) and while all of them were unethical they were thought to be perfectly rational for the time especially when there was no ethical code experimenters had to stick too.10 facts why ppl comment in youtube“it was concluded that babies shouldnt be near high cliffs” no shit!nothing on the experiments done on twins by the Nazis?Humans are not evil. Many of these experiments were indeed safe. Little Albert might have been scared of a newspaper for a little while, but I’m sure he was fine in the long run. The one with guilt would have frightened the children, but it also gives revolutionary results about how impressionable young children are when it comes to guilt (Then again, I could have told you that myself. Screw you kindergarten teacher, screw you). Sure, many of these were horrible, especially number one, but they were done with intentions that were not cruel. When they sent those boys to camp they probably thought it would end in little more than injuries they could get from falling out of a tree. Number one was a mere misconception, they thought the infants could not be harmed, and knew that they could not remember the agony (which doesn’t justify anything, but still). There were much more horrifying experiments performed on adults.I agree with the clown-beating experiment.Where is Mengele? I mean it. Why is Mengele not on this list?heres some advice have the child be natural no genital mutilation, vaccination, gmo food, anything which is of the mainstream med field because for example ur more likely to mass murder on psych meds than on weed. This is why it’s inflammatory and traumatizing. Even if the baby doesn’t remember the experience, he’ll eventually find out and have an extremely painful flashback. To counteract the problems induced in the child would be ungodly expensive and difficult. I and many other people for example am living with those problems and it’ll be a long road before I’m back on my feet. I read up there are huge aggression problems in men of the US because theoretically of circumcisions this isn’t made up it’s research. If ur curious where I got the information from just ask ill be more than happy to educate you guys on the worldly events.You are over exaggerating the trials. Please look them up. Little Albert then didn’t hit him on the head they simply banging a metal rod to make a loud noise. You are STUPIDThat last one got to me…. poor babies from ’85 and older…I read about the Bobo Doll Experiment in Psychology class when I was in highschool. If I’m not mistaken, I think there’s a doll involved in the experiment (hence, the name ‘Bobo DOLL Experiment’). It’s one of those bounce-back, inflatable, doll thing. It’s has a weight at the bottom so if you punch the inflatable doll, it would bounce back up. Now I forgot if whether it was the video that the kids watched that had the doll and the kids beat up a real clown in the next room, or vice versa. Anyway, when the kids got to the next room, they did beat the clown, but with toys that they find lying around.My point is, I think you’re making some of these experiments out to be worse than it actually is. Either double check your sources or find more reliable sources, cos I’d hate for you to misinform people.Otherwise, great vid 😀number ten is literally just lord of the fliesWhoever thought of number one ought to have open heart surgery done onto him without anaesthesia.They missed one: in the Holy Roman Empire, a bunch of babaies were raised without any human interaction beyond nursing (no language), to see if they would start speaking the ‘divine language’ spoken by Adam and Eve. All of them died.The David Reimer experiment was much worse than presented here. Dr John Money took many intersexed children & tried to force one gender or another. They did surgery on as many as 70 children at Johns Hopkins. Dr Money has been accused of falsifying data because the kids were not happy in a randomly assigned gender. Dr Money was trying to prove nurture over nature & results were not meeting his expectations so he falsified records. When the scandal broke in 1979 the experiment shut down & Hopkins closed all associated records so nobody knows for sure the extent of this. David Reimer just got the most attention because he was physically perfectly healthy (no hormone differentation errors common in intersexed children) before the accident & he had a twin. Dr Money wanted to make David female & raise the brother as a male. Anyways, this is probably the biggest scandal in psychology history & it’s very much swept under the rug to this day. I did a term paper on this in grad school.The “Sex change” one is more tragic than it appears. The “Nature vs. nurture” was actually not proven exactly as one would think, the psychologist who treated David and his twin brother since they were young, made them “act out” sex with each other, with David on the bottom every time. Apparently this was supposed to imprint a womans role in sex onto David, but it ended up hurting both children. They were also forced to take off their clothes and inspect their sex organs to see the differences at a young age.Davids brother died of an overdose, after developing a mental disorder. The entire thing was handled horribly..The only experiment I know of these is the Bobo doll experiment. It is explained completely wrong here. There were 3 groups of children: 1 group was shown a video about an adult abusing the ‘Bobo doll’, 1 group was shown a vid about an adult playing all nicely with the doll and the 3rd group wasn’t shown a video (the controlling group). Then the kids were left in a room with toys and also the Bobo doll. Many kids of the 1st group would also abuse the doll, kids of the 2nd group would just play with it and kids of the 3rd group, well, some played with the doll (nice) and some played with other toys in the room. This really is no cruel experiment, but it does sound like when you only tell half of the story. Then the Marshmallow experiment is also cruel to kids….What happens if I do this? You don’t know until you try it. Taking babies from orphanages is the same as picking up stray pets. The pets overflow the streets so scientists use them for experiments. Same with babies. Yes, yes, a baby is a human. But would you rather a medical experiment version of The Hunger Games? You are chosen at random, instead of that stray cat or that abandoned baby.#1…what the bleeding fuck was wrong with these doctors?!WTF IS WITH NUMBER THREE HOW DO THEY BURN IT OFF!!!!What happen to the child experiment that was done by the nazi party which was Kagome KagomeWow some of these are horrible, really makes me question scientific experiments, it’s great things have improved.The visual cliff one I saw in psychology class, was interesting to say the least.People always complain about circumcising (spelling check?) but they’re quick to forget that in many countries, girls are forced to have their clitoris removed ti stop them “being unfaithful” and “feeling pleasure” as they’re considered posessions to their husband and he can do as he see’s fit with other women. It mostly happens in tribes if I remember correctly but it has been known to happen in the UK/USA No kind of genital mutilation should be allowed unless it is medically needed.“Science isn’t about WHY. It’s about WHY NOT. Why is so much of our science dangerous? Why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won’t hit you on the butt on the way out, because you are fired.”-Cave Johnson (Portal 2)… I’m going to get so much hate because of this comment…Sources to all this?these are the dreams of those who hate children so much that they say they want to torture them or kill them.Am I considered evil for chuckling at the last part of #7?What the f*ck was up with that last one? Man, are all scientists stupider than a 2nd grade level? 😛 Gosh I am not even a scientist yet and I know this…. ignorant bastards…#3 pisses the crap out of me. He couldn’t give his opinion nor make a change in the project that will change his life.I hope the doctor in charge learned his lesson.I’m thinking, should I masturbate to this or nah?why BABIES?!!!! But Babies shouldn’t be EXPERIMENTED ON!!!!!!!! The EXPERIMENTERS should be in JAIL!!!!! >:( >:(Really? so all that to prove that children can be manipulated by adults and babies should be watched over properly? What else would they discover next? Poison is poisonous to babies?#3 is downright horrible.Babies are the shit of the world.Who hits a baby on the side of its head with a hammer? Disgusting people. How can you do that to your own kind?Gets a lot worse. The hundreds of Canadian orphans used as lab rats to develop now-illegal lobotomy surgeries should probably have featured.Lab animals would die to switch places with most of these children!Poor kids :(. And now in present time we experiment on animals oh joy…On exactly 1:01 the child’s eye pops out slightly…The ”Little Albert” one is freakin’ disgusting.184.108.40.206.That’s just not righti know it’s bad but you should NEVER EVER say that about god D-:<I cried a little at #1, open heart surgery without anesthetic is the most gruesome and painful thing that could be done to a babyIt gets so much worse. Let Feminism do its Job.Poor little guys. Shows how much u could fuck up ur kids if u don’t do it right.So cruel. All I ever want to do is dropkick a baby, but it’s not morally acceptable.If anything, we should be experimenting on humans. It’ll trim down the human population, and that’s what we need right now.white people also known as Evil and scum of the earthfuckin sick cuntsThe clown one was funnyHow the fuck is Number Eight not as bad as Seven, babies were smashed in the heads with hammers yet putting a baby on an ILLUSION of a sheer drop, not a REAL sheer drop is somehow worse despite nobody getting hurt and actually contributing to somethingOlder parents: Is it true babies were not given any anesthetic for operations?? I find that hard to believe! Can any parent confirm that with personal experience? I mean, excluding circumcision.why test on babies when you can test on rapists and pedophilesNo I hate animals being tested and killed. Give me a fucking brake we have 8 billion humans on earth! Were wasteful, harming and plain old stupid! All we care about is money nothing about nature or other species.Doctors couldn’t figure out that babies might need anesthetic until 1985? Are you kidding me? Im sure they cried and screamed something fierce and they all just stood around and said “hmm he doesn’t feel a thing”We gots a million rapists and pedophiles in the jails but they gots ta experiment on babies?! (Read this in the voice of Angelica from Rugrats)i’d like to hear more about what happened with them making that one classroom of kids racist.THESE KIDS WOULD BE ALIVE TODAY IF IT WERN’T FOR DUMBASS HUMANSMany of these doctors were ahead of their time. A lot of the things we know about child psychology came from these “sick fucks”.if it’s ok to do this shit to animals, then it should be ok to test on people or it shouldn’t be ok to neitherOK! the little Albert experiment DID NOT go like that. all they would do is when he interacted with something, they would hit a hammer against a METAL BAR not fuckin his head. that would be illegal dumbassThe number one most disturbing child experiment ever is telling children they will burn in hell for eternity if they don’t follow the evil that is religion. Now you have idiotic people doing stupid things like killing for their nonexistent god and total annihilation of mankind because of it.idk y this just made me sad i stopped after 6…no more.If this shocks you then you should be just as shocked at the experiments done on animals to this day. People who test on them are disgusting, heartless and cruel.oh myThis world keeps getting shittier and shittier. Babies are being experimented on? Maybe lets experiment on the experimentors. ._. People are being rascist and fuck now white people made Ebola for the black people. Nah. But seriously, will the future be: You must have abortion, we are stopping sex, kids have to sleep in a sheet full of cow shit, only people who have black hair can have a device, when people reach the age of 64 they will be hung, kids who have allergies are allowed to be purposly drowned? Wholey fuck. I’ll shit on you if you want this future.Now piss off and let me eat my pie.Good day to you too.Didn’t see how any of this was disturbing. Sure it’s wrong, but far from disturbing.explain to me how 7 is supposed to be disturbingI’m in chock! This is completely violating the children’s rights! Using them like objects, traumatizing them, causing their future suicides..! Children are people, they feel pain and the infancy will define who we are as adults. USA, China, Russia, etc, completely crazy and criminal states.There’s one I heard of called the ‘Pod Baby’ experiment. My Economics teacher brought it up when we were learning about the basic needs of the human individual. Five babies were abandoned at a hospital. The doctors tried to find the parents, but nobody came forth, so they began an experiment. The babies were supplied with all the basic needs – food, water, shelter, oxygen and warmth – within a sterilized pod that meant no human contact was necessary. Without the primal need of affection satiated, all the children died within 10 days.These weren’t that disturbing… I’ve heard about most of them in my high school and college psychology classes.#1 was truly messed up. While not being educated in the medical field, I can no doubt tell you that if I were a surgeon, I would refuse to operate on a baby which was still fully wide awake during an invasive procedure.It blows my mind how ignorant people of the past could be but it makes me wonder if future generations will think the same of us.Wow, that last one was purely evil; how stupid were we in the 80 to think that babies did not feel the same pain that we feel as adults.“bobo doll experiment”… it´s some how fucking funny to imagine xDBeen saying this for years, the reason for the uprising cases of paedophilia actions……..more sexy 12 year olds.The belief that babies didn’t feel pain can be explained by the fact that the nervous system take a loooong time to become fully mature. Later they also discovered that when a baby feel too much pain (kind of pain you feel when your body is cut open), he becomes totally motionless. The face muscles are just unable to contract : that’s why they tought it wasn’t painful.OMG!!! Who would do that to innocent kids?!?! Its so sad what people would do for science!I was looking at them all with a sad face but come on, im sure we all laughed when it came to the clownI was sent here from future Alltime10s.#’s 3 & 1 are devastating……The last one… God. That is horrible.Holy mother cow!!! What kind of person made it legit to operate on babies without anesthetic??? Well if he is still alive I have 3 words for him: FUCK YOU BITCHAre these scientists, psychologists and doctors are sick or what? I couldn’t bear to watch this and imagine how these victims must be feeling going through this horrifying experiments.I laughed my ass of with the clown and then I hated humanity with the baby and no anesthetics.No debí verlo.There is a movie made about the Third Wave experiement, it is called “Die Welle” (The Wave). It is a German movie but even as a non-German I really enjoyet it, it’s freaking great. It takes the real experiment events and then takes it a little bit further, a kind of “what-if” scenario that’s pretty realistic. I highly recommend it.Bandura wasn’t nearly as unethical as the others on this list. For starters they didn’t punch a real clown it was a inflatable doll. And the long term effects were little to none compared to the previous entries it was hardly unethical. Apart from the issue that the children themselves couldn’t give consent so it was obtained from parents there isn’t very many ethical guidelines broken.Government has been turning our youth into sheepish, compliant, sissies for years now. In the US anyway. The strong, intelligent young man is a rare thing these days.It looks like idiots are trusted to come up with experiments, considering common sense bears out when the results come in. And Doctors must have been heartless to operate on babies that felt every single pain…very sad.Well, most of these are disturbing, but the one with the illusion of the cliff was perfectly safe. I doubt the babies even realized that it looked like anything but a pattern on the floor… what would be disturbing is if there was any kind of actual drop2:50 … Oh my god….hold on, some of these experiments are misrepresented by this video. im a psych student and more than half of these are misrepresented. i am reporting this video, this is garbage, do your fucking research before you start making accusations about things such as this.I find all of these interesting. Yeah, i have no soul. I hate kidsWhat about Nazis raping twins for sceintific purposes?The wording about the stuttering experiment was all wrong.Wow. I am a soc student, and I have not herd of half of these.No.1 ‘experiment’ conclusion being Psychologists have to be VERY closely regulated,especially now they mostly belong to the ‘Elite’ Money Monsters!Where is the Jane Elliot experiment?Why even have a baby go through circumcision? How annoying and useless thing to do..Number 1 is fucked up as hell.. I’v been through a bunch of surgeries in my life, and i can easily say.. Without Anesthesia my mind would be completely fucked up. I can’t even imagine a baby having to go through open heart surgery without anesthesia… Its too much to even imagine..This is pretty messed up but, do we really need to experiment to come to the conclusion that babies should not be near high edges? At least it wasn’t a real cliff O_OHang on, what’s wrong with #5? I don’t expect the students were doing anything harmful to the infants, seems fairly pedestrian and decidedly un-disturbing.I didn’t get the first one, someone explain.The stutter incident is incorrect. The children with the stutter were given positive reinforcement, while the ones without the stutter were given negative reinforcement. It was so bad for them some of the children developed a stutter, while other children never spoke again fearing they too would develop a stutter. I do not know if any other information on the video is incorrect, but I learned about that particular case and that is why I am commenting. Really need to fact check thoroughly before making a video.#3 & #1 were the most disturbing to meI think the davids reimers one was so sad. Freakin psychologist. Just to prove nurture vs nature. Did the parents even agree with it.HOLY MOTHER OF FUCK WHY?!!!lol number 2 was funnyIf I was one of them kids that got hit with a hemmer when I grew up I would’ve went to one of the scientists who had the sick idea and beat the shit out of him with a hammerThe number 1 is so fucking retardedI so agree with and respect your claim because it makes sense, but how ever we are talking about our own humanity. It’s a bit of a difference.Jesus fucking Christ! These ppl must have been sadists!Holy crap!!!!! #3 was REALLY messed up!!!! Why does that doctor think BURNING off a you know what is showing nurture over nature or what ever!!!!My grandma was involved in the project where you could “test” the baby and bring it home. She brought a baby home and took care of her, so that baby is now my aunt Madeline… It’s a nice story and all but my auntie Madeline is… Kinda crazy.*distresed moaning sound* This is fucked up.Wtf who wants to have a hammer banged against your head if u interact with things ? WtfThats CripplingThe 3rd was the most shocking.Odd how they didn’t mention the many tests done on Japanese child victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki or Project MKUltra.All this pisses me off all those people Will or have died and hopefully in a bad evil wayOn #2, the children did not assault a real clown. The clown they attacked was a fake, life-sized stuffed plushy. You made it seem like the kids beat up an actual human.the cliff experiment is not disturbing. AND where is Nikolai Krasnogorsky? He did Pavlov’s Dog Experiment on orphans.A lot of these studies have been taken out of context or misrepresented – some of them aren’t actually that bad. For example, in Bandura, Ross and Ross’ “Bobo doll” experiment, they showed clips of adults hitting an inflatable clown doll – not a real clown! Or in the Little albert experiment, you failed to mention that they did de-condition him afterwards so that he was no longer afraid of the objects. Also, the aim of the robber’s cave experiment wasn’t to see how hostile they would become, it was to observe group behaviour and it didn’t “end in arson”etc. – it ended with tasks that relied on team work skills that reunited the boys involved in the study – leaving many of them friends with the people they had disliked earlier in the experiment.I knew of half of these already and none of them really shocked me. Humans will be humans after all. Great sometimes. Fucked up other times.The David one..People, keep in mind that these experiments were done to benefit humanity as a whole.Child experimentation is happening right now. The U.S. government is testing what happens when you brainwash children from the start to become socialists/liberals and shut out all other ideologies. A nice death spiral is occurring 🙂Little albert was actually conditioned to fear the color white. Smh… learned that in psych. They never reconditioned him so he was petrified for his intire life.I’m not condoning these experiments, but some weren’t explained correctly like Little Albert or the Visual Cliff. The Stanford Prison Experiment was another cruel experiment. I’m surprised it wasn’t shown.number 4 was interestingWell, that gave me nightmares.But it would be such a NiCe place for rapists, pedophiles, etc, gv em an acre, do ur experiments, they can all drink wine n be happy on themselves. Meantime, kids CAN finally walk that block to school without problems.Half of these are false, and misguided. They really need to check their facts. I am a psych student and the David Reimer one, the bobo doll, the robbers cave and the little albert one were not fully explained and had mostly false facts.This video is trash. And so are most (not all) the viewers. This video was based upon child experiments,and, some of you are saying that it’s okay for them to do it because they do it on animals? I disagree with animal/human experiments. But, if a doctor or scientist wants to do a human experiment, go to a prison. There is over hundreds of rapist and sex offenders there. I don’t care if you disagree with me or not. This is my personal opinion. Comment what you think.wow until 1985 bc they don’t go into shock? you want to go into shock if you’re in agonyI don’t want to live on this planet anymore. Testing harmful experiments on Helpless Animals & babies….smh..I heard a different story about the man whose penis was burnt off as a baby. He rejected the identity and became happily married to a woman, they even cut off his test scales as well because they wanted him to be female. Anyway, it ended up being his brother who was healthy committing suicide. That’s the story my grandmother told me anyway that she read somewhere.terrible experiments may i ask what is the music used i rather like itbwahahaa am I supposed to be sad over this ? If anything this just brings justice to animals.Josef Mengele anyone???I wouldn’t consider the “Visual Cliff” experiment to be disturbing because the babies were not harmed in any way, and it actually contributed to knowledge that could ensure greater safety during child care.A lot of these experiments were spun to look bad but were in fact completely harmless. The “ledge” was a small table that appeared to slope downward but was covered in glass. The babies couldn’t fall; it was just like the depth perception tests we have today. Also, in the bobo doll experiment, it was exactly that: a doll. The “clown” that they “assaulted” was just a doll that they kicked after seeing an adult do so. Some of these were legitimately horrifying, but others just seemed to only be there to fill the list up to ten.who the fuck do’s that to children in freaking development of youth and infantsI don’t see how the toy one was bad. I feel bad for the kids, yeah, but how the hell would that traumatize them? I broke stuff all the time as a kid, I felt bad, but my mother didn’t care so it was fine. And from the sound of it, it doesn’t sound like the examiner put the child down, just acted surprised… I guess some kids just have a complex at an early date.All these people are sociopaths and need to rot in the deepest fiery pits of hell for what they did to those poor kids.Especially the psychologist moron who suggested a sex change for the kid.Do they still do this? C.cWait a minute! The Robber’s Cave Experiment happened in 1954? That’s the same year Lord of the Flies happened.OMG if I saw I mother want to get there baby thrown off a cliff I would throw her off then probably cry then cry then cry and so onThey do this every day black to white to both them doing it to mixed race it is done in street schools and work and even to those in Africa rubbish dump and poor they never stop abuse there abuse addictsMost of these are just duh situations, I found these things out just from being with little kids. Great minds? PatheticAt least nowadays child experiments are no longer happening as I know, but animal experiments are still happening, not normal experiments but ruthless ones without any pity on dogs, monkeys, cats…ect and people just don’t give a shit about them but when it comes to humans it’s considered evil and horrible…how comes??!!I’m familiar with the visual cliff, little albert and the sex change (Money’s) one… The visual cliff experiment was to test if perception was innate or learned; the Little Albert was used on a child who had full consent from the mother (she shouldn’t have given it, obviously), and the child was given therapy and was unconditioned from the phobia and Money’s one is pretty accurate… except David grew up to be like 40 odd and had a wife and kids etc. not quite as blunt as the video puts itThe accidentally-neutered kid one is brought up a lot in gender issues; less mentioned is the psychologist’s abusive methods. Even if it had been conducted on more than one child, the only conclusion drawn would be “don’t make children do fucked up things”.Just imo medical experimentation is worse than murder and pedophilia combined. Especially the pills. At least with the other crimes the aggressors weren’t the ones you thought were supposed to help you.#1 was the one that made me cry so much… do these tests on the murderers, rapists and pedophiles in prison.some of these experiments were totally misrepresented, one of them being the cliff experiment. as stated in the video, babies were allowed to crawl on top of a platform which was partially covered with glass, creating a visual cliff. the goal of the experiment was to discover at what age babies develop depth perception. modified forms of the experiment include mothers on the other side of the “cliff” enticing the baby to crawl over the glass, to see if maternal influence would affect the baby’s decision or not. this experiment has also been tested on baby animals such as kittens and lambs and they all show anxiety when placed in front of the visual cliff, indicating that they too, develop depth perception at a certain age. There is absolutely nothing disturbing about this experiment -_-Why was the Bobo Doll experiment worded like they were assaulting a live clown? It was called that because they placed them in the room with a big doll of a clown, called a bobo doll. It wasn’t really disturbing or anything like that, it merely showed the interaction between role modelling, and outcome.Another point, Little Albert was conditioned to be afraid of, specifically, a white rat. Not objects. He was thus conditioned to be afraid of white rat, and furred things in general. The disturbing point was that the experimental effects were not “removed”; Albert was never exposed to a process called “extinguishing”, which would remove the connection between the banging sound, and the rat, thus removing the fear.WTF Did i just watchWhy is it that doctors are so cruel to babies? Not only did doctors operate on babies without anestetics, it’s the doctors that perform abortions. I thought doctors were supposed to do no harm!I think it’s okay that people make these kind of experiments on kids they dont have a conscious on that age anywayfuck my life.. fuck me.. why i am watching this>?#7 the conclusion is wrong in the video. What source was used because Gibson was studying depth perception in humans. She concluded that humans develop depth perception at an early ageLet me make something clear. Humans >>>>>>>>>>>> animals. I can’t believe how many comments there are about animal experiments.I actually burst into tears, they shouldn’t fucking do that to babies, it’s FUCKING WRONG! I don’t mean to sound mean but I’d rather them do it to animals! Just leave the fucking babies alone!!!!! They didn’t d anything fucking wrong!!! Anyone who experiments on a baby I will fuck them up!This is some nice porn music.Okay, seriously, the one about Baby Albert is so overdone. Really. And the one with the babies over a “cliff” is them crawling from an opaque side of a table to a transparent side, and see their reaction… It’s just not that bad. At all.If you actually watch the video footage of the Little Albert experiment, you’ll find that the wording in this video is deliberately made so it is interpreted in a shocking way. The hammer was banged against a metal gong, and the child became scared of white rats. That is all.#4 was wrong, it was positive to the stutterers and negative to the non stutterers. where at the end the non stutterers were traumatized. +Whoever would do that to an infint or child is a monster that shouldn’t be born if anyone is doing that today I’m coming for u I’ll send whoever does that to the after life u would wish u wouldn’t have been bornActually the Bobo doll experiment isn’t that disturbing. The experiment was conducted by Albert Bandura.Some children were shown a video of an adult hitting a clown DOLL, hence bobo doll. And other children were shown a video of adults being nice to the clown doll.Children who were shown the violent video tended also be violent to the clown doll when presented with it. Children shown the nice video tended to treat the doll nicely when presented with the doll.I know this because I studied this experiment in my Child Life and Development class.if some people requested this, wow there fucked up and hate baby’s, and hate him or her selflol these fucking idiots saying that we shouldve experimented on pedophiles and fucking not animals or babies. holy shit. thanks puritan culture for making people retarded. its a psychological experiment, the data would be irrelevant if they used an adult or animal, its to measure affects on development, fucking idiots. holy shet. also, pedophiles are people, just have a different sexual preference, i bet there are more that dont act on it then do, being born with such an anomaly and resisting it, despite it being from the most basic urge, to reproduce. seriouslyPoor babiesthe one where they burned off the boy’s penis and decided oh hey lets make him a girl, was really fucked up. like wtf dude, you could have done some sort of skin transplant and reconstruct his penis. Poor thing.oh if the communists gain full blown control over the usa this video will look like . . . child’s play.Don’t forget attachment therapy. It’s a legal therapy that is still being done today. Search it up. Also this therapy has killed some children, search for Candace Newmaker.No.8 I think is the most creepiest.Stop putting babies in agony I like babies you monstersIt’s funny because david reimer was the experiment that set off what we know today as “transexuality”.so basicly trans people are crazy,if you consider the fact that most of them are suicidal believing that it’s the fact that people don’t accept them. Sorry mate but even if they did accept you still wouldn’t be happy. You need therapy.PEOPLE THESE DAYS?!?! WHY WOULD YOU TORTURE SUCH AN INNOCENT CUTE BABY?!?!My personal opinion. Doesn’t mean you have to agree you know… but the comments section is filled with people saying “oh, how could they be so cruel to babies?” It’s not like the doctors knew any better. They were taught that babies could not feel pain. So, they operated without anesthetics. They wanted to learn more about human behavior, so they operated on the ones that could not fight against the operation. Orphaned babies. Yeah, I do think it is wrong to hurt the infants in such a way, but that’s modern thinking. Back then, there was a huge portion of human interactions that were in the unknown. Hypothetically, what if vaccines actually caused immense pain to a patient and you have never heard of or had a vaccine? Medical schools teach you that vaccines inject a weaker form of a disease so the patient would resist it. You wouldn’t know it hurt. You would have to operate using it though. Because it s what you were taught.And just like that I’ve lost all hope in humanity.+Alltime10s hey You forgot “The Immortal Childrens” Experiment from WW2 just watch Kagome Kagome-Hatsune mikuWhy would they do this?!?! When is this going to end, it’s not right! Just because they’re babies doesn’t mean they don’t feel pain! :’-(Not mentioned on #3, David Reimer had a brother that was raised with David thinking he was his sister that he eventually also committed suicide. That quack doctor killed two people trying to prove his theory.What the FUCK. Actually tho? That’s it. I’m gonna go live on another planet. Humans are fucking insane.I understand that, while experimenting on animals is a bittersweet alternative to experimentation on children, it is justified. Animals feel and have sentience to a certain degree, however, if not animals, then what do we do to experiment, and further our own knowledge? Relatively few people would VOLUNTEER for these kind of experiments. We would not use death row inmates, at least for areas where the death penalty is banned. If we are to show how humane we are by banning the death penalty, then we would be as equally humane to ban experiments on inmates. No matter how awful it is that rats or other animals are subjected to medical tests, would it not be worse to live in a world of ignorance?WTF PEOPLE DO THIS!!!!!!!!!I’ve got an experiment for babies, put them in a house carefully crafted and rigged by some magician who can pretend to exhibit telekinesis on a daily basis in everyday situations. Like opening doors or moving a coffee mug towards him and see if the baby will eventually through copying develop real telekinesis as he or she is raised by a magician couple.I saw something like #6 in Spongebob ._.Maybe thats why I hate clowns …#1: What the hell!! They aren’t dolls, they are indeed living humans and they bleed and scream they same way an adult would.Every All time 10 video comment section will always have some top comment bashing the US. “America does this all the time” “America is corrupt” “Christianity is stupid, like America hur hur hur.” Is that all people do? Are they incapable of going beyond that point and talk about something different? Or are they bound to making the same argument over and over and over again?1.) Forcing some kids to listen to Justin Beiber music to see how long it would take for their ears to bleed.It was concluded in 1.6 seconds, but studies show that the bleeding started less than .00000001 seconds after the noise was started.These experiments are especially disturbing since they involve children.Okay, #1 is actually just sad. Thats disturbing and sad. Thats the worst one I’ve ever seen ;_;#7 LOL, best experiment ever totally worth the money for that conclusion.2:06 I remember hearing this (I think from +Rob Dyke , but due to the lack of info, I fail to remember/understand how the children who didn’t stutter and got positive reinforcement stuttered. I swear it was the other way around.What does #3 have anything to do with kids?The monster experiment was a little different from that, although it was certainly questionable.Honestly I think that anyone who experiments on anything living ( unless the subject is fine with it ) Is sick.Actually the Bobo doll experiment is one of the more ethical experiments performed in psychology. It was observing human nature with role models and sociality by having two groups of children who would be in a room with an adult with the bobo doll.In group 1 the adults would beat up the doll. The children were then left in the room alone with the doll, results showing more than 50% of the children started to beat up the doll and even copied some of the things the adult did. In group 2 the adults played with the doll nicely. The children were then left in the room alone with the doll ans they then started to play with the doll nicely.Hey, be happy they weren’t told to shock a guy to a point it would kill him. This actually happened :p An experiment had people believe they shocked someone to a voltage it would kill someone but the guy was an actor, faking screams. Oh and making a baby monkey cry because of a robotic death machine. And removing the salivary glands out of a dog to observe classical conditioning. And don’t even get me started on the prison experiment!#1 hell nahhhhhh THAT’S fucked up! Their all fucked up!#1 is just sick. and I was born in 85 lolllWe live in better times now, but we will dietesting on any form of life is just wrongI remember reading a small article in my psychology textbook about an experiment with a little boy and a mouse (or at least I think it was). Basically at the start of the experiment, the little boy liked the mouse and wasn’t scared at all from. Then after hearing loud sounds which frightened the little while playing with the mouse, the boy was terrified of them.why test on civilians and stuff. test these types of experiments on prisoners with consecutive life sentences because they are not getting out of that prison alive so might as well help the human kind learn by volunteering for these experiments.The first experiment wasnt disturbing, they were living the fucking life. Eating, pillaging and fighting as they pleased… .-.I can’t belive it was legal to operate on babies that way that’s sickoThe David Reimer case is quite interesting to think about thanks to its implications in regards to issues on gender and transgenderism.Back when Alltime10s were actually good.That’s horribleWARNING very disturbing contentUnbelievable what these kids went through all in the name of science… Talk about a Cover up…..I’ve actually seen the ‘cliff’ study done. That shit is fucked up. I hated every second of it. Mothers would be pissed in seconds. And that last one…haunts me to my foundation. That was super fucked up. Gosh that’s dark.The cliff one wasnt bad… Its not like they were on a real cliffI had a hard time reading the text….thats what they get those children are annoying and the only way to stop it is to kill it and when i see a baby or child die in agony i would be so happy to see them die and say yay the baby is killed lets partyOn #7, I was thinking,”well no shit Sherlock”the last one was horribleWasnt there one where they deprived newborns of any human contact other than having basic needs met, such as food, bath, and diapering? The babies did not thrive, but died?“…And it was concluded that babies shouldn’t be left near high edges.”Wow. You think? o_OI would also add the Atomic Energy Commission’s radiation experiments on children in the 1940’s and 50’s…that no anesthetic thing is freaking CRUEL AND INHUMANE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY’RE LIVING BEINGS TOO! THEY EXPERIENCE THE PAIN TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE POOR THINGS!!*Baby jokes ahead, be warned*How many babies do you need to paint a house? – Depends on how hard you throw.What’s the most difficult thing to do when walking across a dead baby? – Hiding my boner.What’s the difference between a Ferrari and a trash can full of dead babies? – I don’t have a Ferrari in my garage.What’s funnier than burying a baby up to his neck? – Mowing the lawn afterwards.What’s the difference between a truck full of sand, and a truck full of babies? – You can’t relocate sand with a digging fork.There is science that i love and science that I hate. This one is the hate. What kinda people do u have to be to screw up a human’s life in the name of science? And the people who applause them for their ‘discovery’……#1 is not an experimentHow the hell were these experiments ever sanctioned in the first place?The people who performed the experiments ARE COMPLETE IDIOTSI hATe the people that DO THAT!#3 Phew, glad it wasn’t me. Even though it’s fucked up.The USA also had many of Josef Mengeles. Well, they are also the native country of the real Nazis, right? At least the idea of the Nazism comes from the USA.the monster study did NOT cause the children to stutter it caused those who believed they would stutter to become deathly afraid of stuttering.You forgot about the twins in germany from ww2The little Albert was just to muchPoor baby’sWhy would you burn off a kid’s um if I may “private parts” as an experiment?No. 1 is not an experiment, leaving ‘the 9 most disturbing child experiments’. Yet, you fail to even mention any of the disgusting experiments carried out on children (particularly twins) by the Nazi Doctor, Josef Mengele!Kommentare sind geschlossen.