skip to Main Content

Visualizing The Fourth Spatial Dimension – Tesseract – 6 Rotations

Via

Dieser Beitrag hat 273 Kommentare
  1. There was never any selection for viewing the world in 4 dimensions. Our ancestors only needed used 3 dimensions for survival. But one day, I’m confident that a mind will be born that functions beyond genius capacity that will be able to grasp 4 dimensional space.

  2. There was never any selection for viewing the world in 4 dimensions. Our ancestors only needed used 3 dimensions for survival. But one day, I’m confident that a mind will be born that functions beyond genius capacity that will be able to grasp 4 dimensional space.

  3. There was never any selection for viewing the world in 4 dimensions. Our ancestors only needed used 3 dimensions for survival. But one day, I’m confident that a mind will be born that functions beyond genius capacity that will be able to grasp 4 dimensional space.

  4. There was never any selection for viewing the world in 4 dimensions. Our ancestors only needed used 3 dimensions for survival. But one day, I’m confident that a mind will be born that functions beyond genius capacity that will be able to grasp 4 dimensional space.

  5. There was never any selection for viewing the world in 4 dimensions. Our ancestors only needed used 3 dimensions for survival. But one day, I’m confident that a mind will be born that functions beyond genius capacity that will be able to grasp 4 dimensional space.

  6. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  7. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  8. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  9. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  10. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  11. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  12. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box.  these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  13. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  14. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  15. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  16. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  17. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  18. the 4th dimension is 4 versions of yourself and the 5th version of yourself is your guardian angel or the good angel that rest on your shoulder. but to keep it science the 4th dimension is one of (4 cubes in one) with no up or down BUT it has an outer layer/2nd cube forming a double layered box. these 4 dimensions are also the 4 beasts in the book of revelation that our other 3 spirits reside.

  19. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  20. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  21. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  22. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  23. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  24. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  25. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  26. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  27. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  28. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  29. I don’t believe you. If you can grasp 4-D space, explain it to a physicist and they’ll see if it agrees with the math. Your name will be all over the scientific journals, I’ll read about it, and then come back and give you a thumbs up.

  30. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  31. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  32. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  33. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  34. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  35. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  36. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  37. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  38. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  39. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  40. It is unwise and inflammatory to use religious shpeel as explanations for things such as this. Do as Jesus would: be honest. You sir, Selah, don’t understand shit. I’m not saying I or anyone else here does, but I am saying that you, specifically, appear to understand very little.

  41. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  42. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  43. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  44. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  45. you sound already convinced =)  (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  46. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  47. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  48. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  49. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  50. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  51. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  52. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  53. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  54. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  55. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  56. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road  ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  57. you sound already convinced =) (Number, Letters, Colors, Shapes) <-- theres your 4 dimensions.. sn: and people wonder why we werent taught numbers until the end of the road ;))~ to escape lies and hypocrite scientist who lean on the favoritism from our master to spew separation. some people wont make it to Pleiades..hehe

  58. Hey, everybody. I wrote an iPad/iPhone app called The Fourth Dimension that does a great job of explaining this and lets you manipulate a tesseract directly, using your fingers.

  59. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  60. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  61. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  62. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  63. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  64. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  65. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  66. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  67. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  68. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  69. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  70. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  71. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  72. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  73. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  74. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  75. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  76. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  77. This video is a 2D representation of a hypothetical 3D atmosphere that represents a 4D geometrical shape. Since it’s humanly impossible to see in 4 dimensions and our monitor can’t show us 3 dimensions, what we’re watching is just a 2D image trying to be something it isn’t. Until we undergo a major cognitive evolution we will never be able to see what a Tesseract actually looks like.

  78. Shouldn’t there be 3 more, „boring“ rotations? If I look ’straitdown‘ on a turning phonograph record (or 25 stacked on top of each other…) I can turn it clockwise or counterclockwise. The image stays ‚unchanged‘ it is at different angles – image content stays same…it turns though. And if I move my perspective 90 degrees to the side of the ‚record stack‘ then I see a rotation that does image-change. In 4D they see with a 3D retina. Our 3D Rotations would be boring, ie ’same image no change‘.

  79. Shouldn’t there be 3 more, „boring“ rotations? If I look ’straitdown‘ on a turning phonograph record (or 25 stacked on top of each other…) I can turn it clockwise or counterclockwise. The image stays ‚unchanged‘ it is at different angles – image content stays same…it turns though. And if I move my perspective 90 degrees to the side of the ‚record stack‘ then I see a rotation that does image-change. In 4D they see with a 3D retina. Our 3D Rotations would be boring, ie ’same image no change‘.

  80. Shouldn’t there be 3 more, „boring“ rotations? If I look ’straitdown‘ on a turning phonograph record (or 25 stacked on top of each other…) I can turn it clockwise or counterclockwise. The image stays ‚unchanged‘ it is at different angles – image content stays same…it turns though. And if I move my perspective 90 degrees to the side of the ‚record stack‘ then I see a rotation that does image-change. In 4D they see with a 3D retina. Our 3D Rotations would be boring, ie ’same image no change‘.

  81. Shouldn’t there be 3 more, „boring“ rotations? If I look ’straitdown‘ on a turning phonograph record (or 25 stacked on top of each other…) I can turn it clockwise or counterclockwise. The image stays ‚unchanged‘ it is at different angles – image content stays same…it turns though. And if I move my perspective 90 degrees to the side of the ‚record stack‘ then I see a rotation that does image-change. In 4D they see with a 3D retina. Our 3D Rotations would be boring, ie ’same image no change‘.

  82. Shouldn’t there be 3 more, „boring“ rotations? If I look ’straitdown‘ on a turning phonograph record (or 25 stacked on top of each other…) I can turn it clockwise or counterclockwise. The image stays ‚unchanged‘ it is at different angles – image content stays same…it turns though. And if I move my perspective 90 degrees to the side of the ‚record stack‘ then I see a rotation that does image-change. In 4D they see with a 3D retina. Our 3D Rotations would be boring, ie ’same image no change‘.

  83. Too many beer-years (the distance a randomly walking drunk travels in 13 months) for me to understand the Lozenz Poincaré Einstein Minkowski Spacetime Non Simultaneity material I’m afraid. The Earth turning – that is Odd talk isn’t it ! ! the Earth isn’t moving… its turning – so old-fashioned Neutonian type ideas would say the gravity is the same so nothing should happen (except falling or orbiting).

  84. Too many beer-years (the distance a randomly walking drunk travels in 13 months) for me to understand the Lozenz Poincaré Einstein Minkowski Spacetime Non Simultaneity material I’m afraid. The Earth turning – that is Odd talk isn’t it ! ! the Earth isn’t moving… its turning – so old-fashioned Neutonian type ideas would say the gravity is the same so nothing should happen (except falling or orbiting).

  85. Too many beer-years (the distance a randomly walking drunk travels in 13 months) for me to understand the Lozenz Poincaré Einstein Minkowski Spacetime Non Simultaneity material I’m afraid. The Earth turning – that is Odd talk isn’t it ! ! the Earth isn’t moving… its turning – so old-fashioned Neutonian type ideas would say the gravity is the same so nothing should happen (except falling or orbiting).

  86. Too many beer-years (the distance a randomly walking drunk travels in 13 months) for me to understand the Lozenz Poincaré Einstein Minkowski Spacetime Non Simultaneity material I’m afraid. The Earth turning – that is Odd talk isn’t it ! ! the Earth isn’t moving… its turning – so old-fashioned Neutonian type ideas would say the gravity is the same so nothing should happen (except falling or orbiting).

  87. Too many beer-years (the distance a randomly walking drunk travels in 13 months) for me to understand the Lozenz Poincaré Einstein Minkowski Spacetime Non Simultaneity material I’m afraid. The Earth turning – that is Odd talk isn’t it ! ! the Earth isn’t moving… its turning – so old-fashioned Neutonian type ideas would say the gravity is the same so nothing should happen (except falling or orbiting).

  88. Einstein Spacetime isn’t the main topic here. Its Euclidean geometry. Have a strait line then we get graph paper — a flat Euclidian x,y plane. By giving 2 coordinates we can say where a point is and name it. Then we get a xyz grid — 3D. Notice how the line ‚becomes a plane‘ by ’stacking‘ more, parallel, lines „above and below.“ Then 3D is like ‚graph paper‘ ’stacked‘ in parallel ‚above and below.‘ Cubes and Spheres Tetrahedrons Dolphins — 3D.

    Euclidean „4D“continues this thought sequence.

  89. Einstein Spacetime isn’t the main topic here. Its Euclidean geometry. Have a strait line then we get graph paper — a flat Euclidian x,y plane. By giving 2 coordinates we can say where a point is and name it. Then we get a xyz grid — 3D. Notice how the line ‚becomes a plane‘ by ’stacking‘ more, parallel, lines „above and below.“ Then 3D is like ‚graph paper‘ ’stacked‘ in parallel ‚above and below.‘ Cubes and Spheres Tetrahedrons Dolphins — 3D.

    Euclidean „4D“continues this thought sequence.

  90. Einstein Spacetime isn’t the main topic here. Its Euclidean geometry. Have a strait line then we get graph paper — a flat Euclidian x,y plane. By giving 2 coordinates we can say where a point is and name it. Then we get a xyz grid — 3D. Notice how the line ‚becomes a plane‘ by ’stacking‘ more, parallel, lines „above and below.“ Then 3D is like ‚graph paper‘ ’stacked‘ in parallel ‚above and below.’ Cubes and Spheres Tetrahedrons Dolphins — 3D.

    Euclidean „4D“continues this thought sequence.

  91. Einstein Spacetime isn’t the main topic here. Its Euclidean geometry. Have a strait line then we get graph paper — a flat Euclidian x,y plane. By giving 2 coordinates we can say where a point is and name it. Then we get a xyz grid — 3D. Notice how the line ‚becomes a plane‘ by ’stacking‘ more, parallel, lines „above and below.“ Then 3D is like ‚graph paper‘ ’stacked‘ in parallel ‚above and below.‘ Cubes and Spheres Tetrahedrons Dolphins — 3D.

    Euclidean „4D“continues this thought sequence.

  92. Einstein Spacetime isn’t the main topic here. Its Euclidean geometry. Have a strait line then we get graph paper — a flat Euclidian x,y plane. By giving 2 coordinates we can say where a point is and name it. Then we get a xyz grid — 3D. Notice how the line ‚becomes a plane‘ by ’stacking‘ more, parallel, lines „above and below.“ Then 3D is like ‚graph paper‘ ’stacked‘ in parallel ‚above and below.‘ Cubes and Spheres Tetrahedrons Dolphins — 3D.

    Euclidean „4D“continues this thought sequence.

  93. Einstein Spacetime isn’t the main topic here. Its Euclidean geometry. Have a strait line then we get graph paper — a flat Euclidian x,y plane. By giving 2 coordinates we can say where a point is and name it. Then we get a xyz grid — 3D. Notice how the line ‚becomes a plane‘ by ’stacking‘ more, parallel, lines „above and below.“ Then 3D is like ‚graph paper‘ ’stacked‘ in parallel ‚above and below.‘ Cubes and Spheres Tetrahedrons Dolphins — 3D.

    Euclidean „4D“continues this thought sequence.

Kommentare sind geschlossen.

Back To Top