skip to Main Content

Bruce Lee Lighting Matches With Nunchucks

Via

Dieser Beitrag hat 154 Kommentare
  1. Its a cool video. Too bad its fake. And shame on Nokia for using Bruce Lee to promote a their product without even mentioning one single info about the phone they are actualy selling.

  2. Its a cool video. Too bad its fake. And shame on Nokia for using Bruce Lee to promote a their product without even mentioning one single info about the phone they are actualy selling.

  3. Its a cool video. Too bad its fake. And shame on Nokia for using Bruce Lee to promote a their product without even mentioning one single info about the phone they are actualy selling.

  4. Its a cool video. Too bad its fake. And shame on Nokia for using Bruce Lee to promote a their product without even mentioning one single info about the phone they are actualy selling.

  5. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  6. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  7. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  8. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  9. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  10. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  11. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  12. Course not, but first time I’ve seen the video, yeah? My brother was recently telling me off about Chuck Norris. Apparently, Bruce Lee is better. Who knew? >xD

  13. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  14. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  15. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  16. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  17. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  18. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  19. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  20. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  21. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  22. Then why didn’t it fool me for even a second? Some idiot posts an actor hitting a ping-pong ball with nunchcks and suggest in the title it’s Bruce Lee. They even go as far as making the video in black and white and because someone with some intelligence points out that they didn’t fool anyone, then another idiot like yourself has to say I’m just being a critic. Very amusing.

  23. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  24. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  25. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  26. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  27. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  28. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  29. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  30. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  31. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  32. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  33. lol this along the Ping- Pong ad were viral commercials for the Nokia N96.
    Obviously that’s not Bruce Lee, just a look alike…. and apparently successful enough to cause hype. 🙂

  34. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  35. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  36. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  37. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  38. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  39. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  40. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  41. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  42. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  43. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  44. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  45. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  46. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  47. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  48. You missed my point. I was responding to someone who made a very specific comment. So my response to you would be hey maybe that’s smart on Nokia’s end and maybe not. If you copy someones image and don’t say it’s a copy or if you mislead in the title (title says Bruce Lee does it not?) then that’s grounds for a law suit. Lee’s family would definately have a good argument. unless of course Nokia paid them ahead of time and they agreed to it.

  49. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  50. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  51. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  52. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  53. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  54. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  55. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  56. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  57. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  58. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  59. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  60. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  61. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  62. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  63. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  64. I did read the comments, I just think you overreacted a little (and I’m not trying to be rude)
    These kind of promos are for shit and giggles, not meant to be taken so literally.

  65. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  66. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  67. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  68. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  69. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  70. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  71. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  72. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  73. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  74. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  75. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  76. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  77. Yes, it is a very clever fake…it’s part of the same ads where he uses chucks to play ping pong, a la the Forrest Gump special effects.
    And yes…
    李小龍是最好的最好的!
    (Bruce Lee was the best of the best!)

  78. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  79. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  80. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  81. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  82. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  83. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  84. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  85. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  86. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  87. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  88. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  89. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  90. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  91. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

  92. GUYS this phone was announced in 2008 ( Bruce died in ’73) so its not part of some adds that he promotes or smthing. Get over it , he was one of the best intuitive man in martial arts also , many masters in diferent fighting tehniques admit this,If he could do this to matches imagine houw he would see a big arm pounching lol , thats why he never fight in the ring ( besides a couple of times in his early life)

Kommentare sind geschlossen.

Back To Top