skip to Main Content

Nasa – What Doesn’t Stay In Vegas? Sprawl.

Via

Dieser Beitrag hat 228 Kommentare
  1. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  2. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  3. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  4. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  5. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  6. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  7. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  8. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  9. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  10. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  11. ever look at a petri dish with mold or fungus growing on it? Yeah thats exactly what this looks like….we’re just a more advanced, more sophisticated „fungus“ on earth!

  12. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  13. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  14. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  15. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  16. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  17. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  18. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  19. @ased215er its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  20. its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  21. its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  22. its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  23. its just perspective really. you could say that planets are a „fungus“ of the universe. it’s really just a comparison of view not any real commentary on human beings

  24. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  25. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  26. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  27. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  28. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  29. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  30. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  31. @jvemPiRe14 ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  32. ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  33. ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  34. ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  35. ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  36. ….I just thought that it LOOKED like a petri dish…which it does. I wasnt tryna be „deep“ about it or make any social commentary I was just saying that this looked like that….I guess if I could see the whole universe in one picture it might look the same but I dunno, havent seen it yet….soooooo ehh whatever, it is what it is ya know

  37. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  38. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  39. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  40. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  41. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  42. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  43. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  44. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  45. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  46. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  47. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  48. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  49. Our house WAS worth $248K, now it’s worth ~$45K This is BS! Screw all these developers that keep building homes while the ones already here are worthless. Greedy, stupid fothermuckers! Save LV, X a developer!

  50. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  51. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  52. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  53. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  54. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  55. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  56. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  57. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  58. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  59. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  60. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  61. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  62. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  63. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  64. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  65. Ah, there you can see I did lost 1988 3 Billon Dollars in Vegas

    and 1989 you can see what they have done with all my money.

    No, but Population Grow will get a problem in the Future

    so needed someone like Nasa takeing an eye on that. Thanks.

  66. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  67. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  68. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  69. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  70. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  71. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  72. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  73. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  74. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  75. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  76. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  77. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  78. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  79. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

  80. It’s a cloud (and its shadow to the NW: the Sun azimuth is SE at the time of the Landsat satellite overpass — at this latitude). There is also a smaller cloud and its shadow. Green vegetation shows in red because these images are standard false color composites that drive the red color gun with the radiance recorded in the near-infrared (NIR) band (green vegetation reflects NIR light but absorbs red light).

Kommentare sind geschlossen.

Back To Top