TITLE
Electing a US President in Plain English
More content based on tag similarity:
- Unique Post
| This entry was posted by admin on October 21, 2008 at 7:27 pm, and is filed under Videos. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 1 year ago
“We need a way to account for the population of each state.” and that’s why it was so much easier to just count the number of votes, especially since it’s possible to become president with less actual votes than another candidate in the current situation as 90% in a state or 51% in a state is equal…
about 1 year ago
thanks so much to people like you! Im austrian and dont have the slightest knowledge on the american election system, but thnx to your video it’s much clearer allready
about 1 year ago
yeyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!
about 1 year ago
@mookow2 in Colombia cartel is president LOL
about 1 year ago
@davecolombia that makes sense, but this way they can sort out all the people who voted for crazy independents (i think) and there’s probably some other reason
about 1 year ago
if a candidate wins your states electors then that would imply that the majority of the states population wants that certain candidate, so why not just count the populations vote instead of a electoral vote…please tell me if that makes sense, or am i just totally wrong …
about 1 year ago
@gkglasgow np haha. Truthfully, i don’t properly understand the merits of a 2 party system. 1 aspect is that it provides a more clear picture of what the American people want. If there is a 40% majority between 3 parties, that means that 60% of the people DIDNT vote for the winning party. With this system, you get it so the majority of the overall population votes for the winning party. That’s just my take, this debate has gone on forever, and will likely go on forever.